Wednesday, January 30, 2013

CAIRNS COUNCIL BRUSHES FLUORIDE FROM WATER SUPPLY

Daniel Strudwick Thursday, January 31, 2013 © The Cairns Post

CAIRNS Regional Council will stop adding fluoride to the city's water supply from next month after deciding yesterday to bypass a public vote and dismantle the equipment as soon as possible.
Anti-fluoride lobbyists are celebrating the decision as a victory in their campaign against compulsory fluoridation.
Meanwhile the State Government and peak health bodies have criticised the council for exercising its recently granted power over fluoride without properly gauging the community's opinion.
Mayor Bob Manning said the issue divided residents evenly, so the council had looked to the Local Government Association of Queensland's policy on the matter, which says ``involuntary medication'' must not be introduced without community consent.
Full report and comment in today's The Cairns Post.
 
Chemical free: There will be no more fluoridating for Paul Harrison, of CRC Freshwater Creek water treatment plant. Picture: STEWART M cLEAN 
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUALAND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY,MIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS,DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com
 

Monday, January 21, 2013

ANGER OVER FLUORIDE PLANS



Anger: fluoride plans have raised health concerns
by JAMES CHAPMAN, Daily Mail
Fluoride is set to be added to drinking water throughout England and Wales despite controversy over the long-term health effects, it emerged yesterday.
The law is expected to be changed so that local authorities can compel water companies to add fluoride to water.
Environmentalists and consumer groups, who believe fluoridation has links to cancer, Down's syndrome and infant mortality, and can also damage bones, will be angered by the Department of Health policy.
Up to half of people drinking fluoridated water also exhibit a condition known as dental fluorosis - a mottling of the teeth.
Mass fluoridation has been blocked in several European countries and 50 U.S. cities, but studies have shown that the substance reduces tooth decay among children.
The NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination found that children in fluoridated areas suffered 15 per cent less decay, because the enamel on their teeth was hardened, while there was no evidence of a bad effect on health.
Currently, about one in ten people in Britain drinks fluoridated water, with some companies adding it, while others refuse to.
Amendments to the Water Bill, expected to be introduced later this month, will shift responsibility for treating water from water companies to regional strategic health authorities. Campaigners say such bodies are more likely to agree to fluoridation.
A letter from Health Minister Hazel Blears and Environment Minister Elliot Morley said: 'Those who remain adamantly opposed would be able to use water filters that remove fluoride or buy bottled drinking water.'
The letter, sent to John Prescott in his role as chairman of the Domestic Affairs Cabinet Committee, added: 'Experience of oral health promotion projects shows that it is much harder to establish regular tooth-brushing in deprived areas because of the costs of toothpaste and, perhaps, because of the less ordered lifestyles of families.'
It added that opponents were in the minority and 'should not be allowed to deprive health communities from opting for fluoridation by insisting on an indefinite research programme'.
The ministers also pointed out the British Dental Association supported fluoridation.
Research revealed children's teeth were three times healthier in and around Birmingham, where tap water has been fluoridated for nearly 40 years, than in Manchester, where it is not.
About five million people in England already have fluoride added to their tap water - in Birmingham, the West Midlands, and Tyneside - while another 500,000 on the eastern coastline get naturally fluoridated-water. But Jane Jones, campaign director of the National Pure Water Association, said: 'There will undoubtedly be a huge row about the renewed proposal to add fluoride to drinking water on a wide scale in the UK.
'This is nanny statism. It is outrageous. To medicate the whole population against their will is not the way to deal with tooth decay.'
A Department of Health spokesman said: 'The Government will be encouraging health authorities with particular dental health problems to consider fluoridating.
'No area would be expected to fluoridate without having undertaken a proper consultation, which established that the measure was strongly supported.'
The fluoridation of water involves the addition of chemicals based on the element fluorine. The substances also occur naturally in vegetables such as endive and curly kale.
j.chapman@dailymail.co.uk
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-180373/Anger-fluoride-plans.html#

ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUALAND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY,MIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS,DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com



Sunday, January 20, 2013

LEAF


ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

MICHAEL SAVAGE - FLU SHOT IS USELESS AND DANGEROUS GOVERNMENT HOAX W/ CDC - 1/11/13


ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY, MIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS, DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

ASPARTAME DAMAGES THE BRAIN AT ANY DOSE

Joe Martino October 6, 2012
Did you know that Aspartame has been proven to cause brain damage by leaving traces of Methanol in the blood? It makes you wonder why Aspartame has been approved as “safe” and is found in thousands of food products. Currently more than 90 countries have given the artificial sweetener the “OK” to be used in foods.
“Multiple Sclerosis is often misdiagnosed, and that it could be aspartame poisoning” – Montel Williams
Given that Aspartame is 200 times sweeter than sugar, manufacturers are able to produce their sweet foods and market them as “low calorie” so they can market and appeal to millions of people on “diets.” There is no doubt that the less sugar you have in your diet, the better. But replacing sugar with aspartame is not the solution, and in fact is likely to be even worse for your health.
In my personal experience, Aspartame has always made my head feel very odd when I consumed it. Headaches, light headedness and overall nausea, are all symptoms I personally feel from consuming Aspartame. But that isn’t even the bad part when you look at what all of the research is suggesting. So I question, and everyone should be asking the same: With all of the research about Aspartame and its dangerous effects, even in small quantities, why is it still approved by the FDA and other health agencies as being safe for human consumption?
Let’s take a look at some research.

What is this lovely substance (Aspartame) made of?

An Aspartame molecule is essentially made up of 3 different substances. 90% of it is made of two natural amino acids, 1 being aspartic acid and the other being phenylalanine. The other 10% of the molecule is made up of a methyl ester bond (includes Methanol). The methanol is released from the aspartame within hours of consumption and begins traveling through the body via the blood. Once the methyl ester bond is broken, is separtes into methyl alcohol and methanol (wood alcohol). The big problem with methanol is that it easily passes into your blood-brain barrier and once there, is converted into formaldehyde. Formaldehyde is what is causing the brain damage. While animals are able to detoxify methanol in the body, humans do not have this capability. It doesn’t really take a rocket scientist to realize that accumulating formaldehyde in the brain is not a good thing.

What’s the deal with Methanol?

As mentioned above, Methanol is the key issue here as it is what converts into formaldehyde. While it is often believed that formic acid is the issue with Aspartame, it is actually formaldehyde. Formaldehyde is a serious neurotoxin and carcinogen. According to the EPA, Methanol is considered a cumulative poison which means is accumulates in the body and very little is excreted each time it is consumed.
Methanol is a toxin that destroys the myelin tissue in your body, which is the insulating material around your nerves that allows nerve signals to travel properly. Once injured, one can have what are called demyelinating symptoms that are commonly seen in diseases like MS and also migraines that can include bizarre and inconsistent visual field disruptions.

But it must be safe in small doses!

While having NO methanol in the body makes most sense, the EPA has accepted that a limit of consumption of 7.8 mg/day is still OK. Why we accept even small amounts of toxic stuff in our body is beyond me, but some feel we can still consume this stuff in small doses. According to Woodrow Monte, Ph.D, R.D., director of the Food Science and Nutrition Laboratory at Arizona State University:
“When diet sodas and soft drinks, sweetened with aspartame, are used to replace fluid loss during exercise and physical exertion in hot climates, the intake of methanol can exceed 250 mg/day or 32 times the Environmental Protection Agency’s recommended limit of consumption for this cumulative toxin.”
Further, he states that due to the lack of a couple of key enzymes, humans are many times more sensitive to the toxic effects of methanol than animals. Therefore, tests of aspartame or methanol on animals do not accurately reflect the danger for humans.
“There are no human or mammalian studies to evaluate the possible mutagenic, teratogenic, or carcinogenic effects of chronic administration of methyl alcohol,” he said.
How can you know you are getting too much Methanol? You may experience headaches, ear buzzing, dizziness, nausea, gastrointestinal disturbances, weakness, vertigo, chills, memory lapses, numbness and shooting pains in the extremities, behavioral disturbances, and neuritis. Another very well known sign of methanol poisoning is vision problems.
Adding to the problem, one of the amino acids in aspartame, aspartic acid is capable of crossing your blood-brain barrier. There it attacks your brain cells, creating a form of cellular overstimulation called excitotoxicity, which can lead to cell death.
Your blood-brain barrier, which normally protects your brain from excess aspartate, as well as toxins, is not able to adequately protect you against the effects of aspartame consumption because it:
  • Is not fully developed during childhood
  • Does not fully protect all areas of the brain
  • Is damaged by numerous chronic and acute conditions
  • Allows seepage of excess aspartate into the brain even when intact
That excess aspartate slowly begins to destroy neurons, and the large majority (75 percent or more) of neural cells in a particular area of the brain are killed before any clinical symptoms of a chronic illness are noticed. Then, when they do occur, they may or may not be associated with aspartame consumption, even though examples of chronic illnesses that are made worse by long-term exposure to excitatory amino acid damage include: Multiple sclerosis (MS), ALS, hormonal problems, memory loss, epilepsy, hearing loss, Alzheimers, dementia, brain lesions, and Neuroendocrine disorders.
It can be easy for us to make the argument that this stuff is OK in small doses, and it hasn’t killed us yet so it can’t be that bad. But it almost seems there is something more to it why we use this reasoning. Are we just addicted to these substances? Afraid to admit we have been poisoning ourselves? Unable to accept that the FDA and health agencies have lied to us? Like to brush these truths off as conspiracies? No matter what the reason is, there comes a point where we must see what is staring us in the face and start looking at how we can begin making new choices. Returning to something that is healthier and more in line with our bodies. We are really damaging ourselves here and becoming quite numb to life. It is susbstances like Aspartame and Fluoride that are causing these issues and the difference it makes to avoid these substances is monumental for our quality of life and consciousness.
Update: One thing I really wanted to add to this article is geared towards really looking at ourselves when it comes to not just aspartame but food, beverage, cosmetics, etc. We all at some point consumed or used products that are not all that great for our bodies. Most of the everyday products we use contain very toxic chemicals, it’s just that we spend a lot of time seeing ad’s about them, using them and looking at the nice labels that look all happy so we don’t realize how bad this stuff really is for us. You may want to check THIS ARTICLE out for more info. The question I want to raise here is, why is it that when information is presented about chemicals and toxic products do we get in a rage about the information and want to justify the continuation of its use in our bodies, on our bodies and on the planet? Even if something like Aspartame was only half as bad as it really is, why would we even want that? Why is the connection we have to our bodies so lost that we want to subject it to toxins, carcinogens, chemicals and other products that 1. are not remotely natural and 2. are not something that should be near our bodies to begin with. It just seems as though the bigger issue here is that we have become very disconnected from not only our bodies but the planet as well. It has become about convenience, money, temporary happiness, filling emotional voids and staying stagnant. When this info is presented all of those buttons get pushed at once and next thing we know we are defending the use of something that should have never been brought into existence in the first place. To look at it further, even the amount of sugar and type of sugar we use in the products we use aspartame in as an alternative, is terrible as well. Any product that currently contains aspartame shouldn’t be consumed by humans to begin with. What is wrong with fruit? Vegetables? Nuts? Seeds? Why do we always need these artificially flavored and chemically enhanced products that are terrible for our health? Aspartame or no aspartame, the real thing to observe here is our disconnection from our bodies, life and the planet.
Sources: http://www.uabmedicine.org/news/Food+%28sugar+substitutes%29
http://www.mpwhi.com/aspartame_methanol_and_public_health.pdf
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22385158
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2012/10/06/aspartame-damages-the-brain-at-any-dose/ 

Monday, January 14, 2013

DOCTOR ADMITS VACCINE IS MORE DEADLY THAN SWINE FLU ITSELF & WILL NOT GIVE IT TO HIS KIDS

AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY MIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS DIVERSE AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

Thursday, January 10, 2013

VACCINES AS ‘CLUSTER BOMBS’


By Rowan Contraho
Shiv Chopra, the Canadian microbiologist known for having helped stop the approval of rBGH, did so not by making true but complex arguments about its association to cancers, but by reducing the issue to an undeniable biological fact and thus simple legal issue.
The law said that no factory containing so much as a single rat dropping or feather is considered clean.  rBGH gives cows mastitis which leads to pus in their milk.   rBGH thus turns cows into pus factories.
Wikipedia (articles there on vaccines appear to have been written by industry), says that “Vaccines are among the greatest achievements of modern medicine.”  Dr. Chopra calls them “cluster bombs.”
“A vaccine is a biological preparation that improves immunity to a particular disease.”  Dr. Chopra says vaccines do nothing of the sort and, in fact, violate the very laws of biology.
As with rBGH, he has a talent for reducing things to understandable and undeniable facts and when it comes to vaccines, he begins at the beginning by describing how the immune system works to protect people from disease.
He says there is a constant war going on between an individual’s bodily integrity and invading organisms.
Most people would most easily recognize this war when they think of bodies rejecting organs from another person or animal.  That very same rejection occurs at a microlevel – against foreign viruses and bacteria.  But rejecting what is foreign, no matter the size, is not just a nice thing or just “how the immune system protects the body” but it does so for a cardinal purpose – to maintain bodily integrity.
And the definition of “integrity” is crucial to understanding the brilliance of the immune system.  “Integrity:  the quality or state of being complete; unbroken condition; wholeness; entirety; the quality or state of being unimpaired; perfect condition …”
In the simplest terms, Dr. Chopra explains that the immune system maintains wholeness or “self” versus “non-self” in the face of invaders.
And it is precisely that wholeness or integrity which vaccines destroy.
The immune system works by breaking down whatever foreign matter enters your body – be it protein, fat, starch or sugar – into single molecules in the digestive system.  Starches and sugar must be broken into glucose, fat to fatty acids, and proteins into amino acids.  The last two the body then takes and rebuilds into the person’s own, no longer foreign, protein and fat.  Anything that remains foreign is and must be rejected.
Bodily integrity must be maintained so the immune system repels invaders by breaking them to pieces or ejecting or destroying them.
In this context, sneezing, coughing, diarrhea, vomiting can be appreciated as protective immune mechanisms to get rid of foreign protein or other matter, while foreign material that gets past into the body is deconstructed by the gut and fever is stimulated as a means weaken or destroy it.
With this background, one understands that in four steps, Dr. Chopra is laying bare the core scientific fallacy of vaccines.
Chopra says that anyone knowing the basics of biology should know:
1.      That all vaccines by their very nature are antigens and that every antigen by defintion must be a foreign protein …;
2. That no foreign protein can be absorbed into the blood stream unless it is digested in the alimentary canal into its basic amino acids;
3. That it is these amino acids which after being absorbed into the blood stream are reconstituted into one’s own proteins and it is these proteins which distinguishes every being of existence into self and non-self.
4. That any interference or tampering with these laws of existence can bring calamity to the being in which it occurs such as by causing auto-immune conditions like autism, etc.
Why calamity?
What happens is that vaccines force foreign protein into the body, bypassing all mechanisms used by the immune system to avoid such invasion.
Think of organ transplants.  The immune system must rid itself of what is foreign.  It will not stop until it has.  It will attack itself to do so if necessary – so fundamental is integrity of self versus invader.
Imagine this were happening to your own home.  People have doors and windows and alarm systems exactly to stop invaders.  Normally we think of them coming to steal but imagine they came to stay, to take over.  The need to eject them and keep the home your own would be unceasing.  Imagine they came in not through the doors or windows for which you had defenses, but through the chimney, through the ventilation system, though the electrical system, and there was no way to be rid of them.  Would it be your home anymore?  Would you be safe?  Would you ever be able to function normally again or would you be on a permanent state of high alert and stress trying again and again to get rid of them?  Might you throw things and damage the walls, or shoot and break things, tearing up your own home?  Would you become exhausted?  Might you break down physically from trying, but could you ever stop trying?  If you did, would it not mean it was no longer your home, but indistinguishable from theirs or maybe even more theirs, having defeated you?
So what happens to the immune system when vaccines jump past its neutralization of foreign proteins before they can enter the bloodstream, and instead foreign matter is injected into the body?  Just like you, the immune system must attack whatever is shot into it, and in being unable to rid itself of that matter or break it down, it attacks again and again, attacking the body itself.  Thus, autoimmune reactions, which are self-attacks. The more vaccines, the more foreign protein is being shot into the body, the more the reactions, the more the body attacks itself.
Vaccines do not, as claimed, “improve immunity.” Even the most rudimentary understanding of what the immune system does would make that obvious.  Vaccines jump the immune system to deliver foreign matter that could never have gotten past it otherwise.  This is foreign matter that the immune system is left helplessly unable to rid itself of.  Foreign matter is lodged permanently in the body, leaving it no longer perfect but broken, impaired.  Bodily integrity is literally destroyed.
From Should I Vaccinate My Child? by Patel Thompson:
“[R]esearchers argue that these attenuated forms of the viruses remain in the body causing continual antigenic stimulation of the immune system – meaning the immune system is always in ‘attack’ mode – which also weakens it and leads to auto-immune diseases.
“A placebo-controlled trial of acellular pertussis vaccines in Sweden compared vaccinated children with un-vaccinated children of the same birth grouping. During the trial, an invasive bacterial infection occurred among the vaccinated group resulting in numerous deaths. A review of the trial data led researchers to conclude that ‘The hypothesis of an immunosuppressive effect of the vaccines, which would explain the deaths…could not be refuted by the data.’ (xvi)
“As further evidence, one of the few double-blind trials that have ever been conducted on a vaccine shows the same immunosuppressive effect. In the trial, of the group who were vaccinated with the Salk polio vaccine, over 200 people went on to contract polio. Among the control group (unvaccinated), not one of them developed polio. (xvii)
“Citing references from numerous valid sources, including four recognized textbooks on paediatrics and immunology, Harold Buttram, MD and John Hoffman, PhD, conclude that childhood vaccination “cannot help but have adverse effects on the immunologic system of the child, possibly leaving this system crippled in its ability to protect the child throughout life…opening the way for other diseases as a result of immunologic dysfunction.” (xviii)
And it is not only foreign virus or bacteria that causes a problem. Chopra writes:
“The foreign proteins in vaccines originate from not only the infectious organisms against which one wishes to produce infection-fighting antibodies but also the artificial media in which these organisms are grown. Contained in such media may include one or more of the following materials: bovine serum, horse serum, chicken egg, monkey kidney, insect cells and even human fetal cells.
“Apart from the foreign proteins, vaccines may also contain other harmful substances, including mercury, aluminum, formalin, oily adjuvants, etc., plus untold number of stray viruses with the potential to cause cancer, HIV, serum-hepatitis, and so on.”
The body is being filled with foreign protein from other human beings and from other species, none of which the immune system can expel, and yet it must if it is to maintain functional integrity – keeping the distinction between “self” and non-self.
“Meanwhile, evidence indicates that except for smallpox, no other infectious disease, e.g.: tuberculosis, cholera, typhoid, anthrax, measles, mumps, rubella, DPT, polio, influenza and others, has been eradicated and that this continues to be so despite the decades of vaccinations against each of these diseases.
“Also, during the same period, the incidence of many previously uncommon diseases such as autism, diabetes, allergies, and cancer, has been increasing in pandemic proportions.”
The person is now contaminated with foreign matter, the “invader” now residing the body, the body attacking itself.
Patel Thompson, again:
“Vaccinal attenuated viruses attach their own genetic ‘episome’ to the genome (half set of chromosomes and their genes) of the host cell, and are thus capable of surviving or remaining latent within the host cells for years. The presence of foreign antigenic material within the host cell sets the stage for their unpredictable provocation of various auto-immune phenomena such as herpes, shingles, warts, tumors – both benign and malignant – and diseases of the central nervous system, such as varied forms of paralysis and inflammation of the brain.” (xix)
“Dr. Markowitz states that in addition, vaccines do not just produce mild versions of the original disease, but all of them commonly produce a variety of their own symptoms. In some cases, ‘these illnesses may be considerably more serious than the original disease, involving deeper structures, more vital organs, and less of a tendency to resolve spontaneously. Even more worrisome is the fact that they are almost always more difficult to recognize.’” (xx)
“In addressing scientists at a conference sponsored by the American Cancer Society, Rutgers University professor R. Simpson warned:
“‘Immunization Programs against flu, measles, mumps, polio and so forth may actually be seeding humans with RNA to form latent proviruses in cells throughout the body. These latent proviruses could be molecules in search of diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Parkinson’s disease and perhaps cancer.’” (xxi)
In claiming vaccines “improve immunity,” the pharmaceutical industry seems to have no idea that the purpose of the immune system is not just to react but to protect biologic integrity, core to human health and life.  Instead, the industry is filling the body with foreign protein, devastating the human immune system.  They are using vaccines containing foreign DNA and a long list of toxic substances that “explode inside the body and hit every part of the body, every cell and molecule” – the “cluster bomb” Chopra speaks of.
“Apart from the foreign proteins, vaccines may also contain other harmful substances, including mercury, aluminum, formalin, oily adjuvants, etc., plus untold number of stray viruses with the potential to cause cancer, HIV, serum-hepatitis, and so on.”
So distant is the pharmaceutical industry from protecting immune function that with each “generation” of vaccines, the vaccines become more harmful.  They went from inserting whole viruses which they now admit were causing the very diseases they were supposed to prevent, to using “recombinant components” (genetically engineered pieces) of a number of viruses, but still they could not get the response they wanted.  So, now they have moved to the third generation of vaccines, DNA vaccines, that inject genetically engineered matter.  Are they called DNA vaccines because they are supposed to be taken up by the person’s DNA?
If so, they would be hitting not just organs and cells but would potentially be contaminating the very biologic code of the person’s life, their DNA.
If this occurs, now the home invader analogy would include mutant (genetically engineered) invaders who would take over the host’s body, as well as her house.
If the new vaccines can imbed or cross contaminate with mutant (genetically engineered) pathogens that affect the DNA, vaccination would be undermining the integrity of self in terms of its instructional messages, the biologic coding of the runs everything in the human body.  The immune system would be left struggling at a much deeper level of reaction, a spasm of reaction.  The most core functions of the body, such as mitochondrial function (basic energy production) might be disrupted.
Was Wakefield seeing damage to fundamental bodily integrity, in seeing mitochondrial dysfunction?  Was Robin MacNeil of PBS seeing it as well in his own sick autistic grandson?
Chopra’s explanation of the immune system and how vaccination bypasses the immune system and leaves in place just what the immune system is tasked to get rid of (foreign protein), makes apparent why it is mistaken to refer to vaccination as “immunization.” Vaccines damage the immune system.  Vaccination would more appropriately be called “anti-immunization.”
Patel Thompson says:
“The bulk of the evidence gathered from numerous countries points out that not only is vaccination ineffective at preventing the spread of infectious disease, but vaccinated children are actually at a higher risk of contracting these illnesses. In addition, the adverse reactions to vaccination are much higher than presently documented in the medico-pharmaceutical literature and the long-term damaging effect of suppressing the immune system is rarely addressed.
“In light of all the evidence to the contrary, why have vaccines been pressed upon the public as a necessary, beneficial way of preventing our children from getting sick? In the words of Dr. Raymond Obomsawin (who’s held senior positions in UNICEF and CUSO), referring to mass vaccination, “It is reprehensible that such actions continue to be enforced by authorities, while parents and local health workers are not accorded any practical knowledge of the known dangers involved, and the extent to which there prevails a general ignorance of the longer term consequences.” (xxii)
Patel Thompson is not alone in seeing that something other than science is behind vaccines.
“Combine this ignorance with the millions of dollars in profit generated by vaccination that goes straight into the pockets of manufacturing companies, governments and medical doctors, and it becomes clear that vaccination is more of a political and economic issue, than a health issue.”
One sees that reality in the behavior of those invested in vaccines, such as Bill Gates.  Rather than addressing the solid and increasing scientific evidence exposing the biologic irrationality of his massive financial commitment in vaccines  (as well as the extreme danger a leading scientist is warning of), he is instead suggesting now that those who question his investment (vaccines) are committing involuntary manslaughter.  Did the pharmaceutical industry insert the article on vaccines in Wikipedia?  It too suggests that expression of concerns over vaccines are tantamount to manslaughter.
“[C]oncern has been raised [by anyone not financially connected to vaccine production?] that spreading unfounded information about the medical risks of vaccines increases rates of life-threatening infections, not only in the children whose parents refused vaccinations, but also in other children, perhaps too young for vaccines, who could contract infections from unvaccinated carriers (see herd immunity).   A more extreme response to this concern is the claim that spreading false information about vaccine risks amounts to involuntary manslaughter, claiming that celebrity promotion of the vaccine-autism link was followed by “an increase in the number of vaccine preventable illnesses as well as an increase in the number of vaccine preventable deaths” and thus “may be indirectly responsible for at least some of these illnesses and deaths.” (Wikipedia, Vaccines)  [Emphasis added.]
As the above quote indicates, the promotion of vaccines is relying on fear.  Vaccine investors are using it (fear of swine flu, of meningitis, of hepatitis, of cervical cancer, of common childhood diseases – adding new fears all the time) to try to put in place the ultimate form of marketing – government mandates of their products.  But educated people are learning that vaccines suppress and even damage the immune system, which is essential for fighting off diseases, and that vaccines were not responsible for the decrease in infectious diseases but can actually increase diseases.
So, to stop such information and the spreading rejection of vaccines, those invested in vaccines (with 200 more in the works) are portraying information (concerns, questions, etc.) about vaccines as lethal.
Yet the pharmaceutical industry and Bill Gates cannot dispute the central biologic fact about vaccines – they are catastrophic to the immune system and it is the immune system that keeps people well or heals them of disease.  The “science” behind the new vaccines is so shaky, the pharmaceutical industry admits it doesn’t know how their DNA vaccines, which are based on “DNA uptake,” are alleged to work:
“This phenomenon has not been the subject of much research, so the actual mechanism of DNA uptake is not known.”  (Wikipedia)
Ignorance of the immune system combined with intense international promotion of an early pharma product (aspirin) is now associated with deaths during 1918, not a flu or virus.  The National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases discovered that common upper respiratory bacteria were responsible for the deaths, nothing viral.  Aspirin is thought to have played a part as doctors did not realize it suppresses the immune system (or the value of fever), and that suppression allowed infections to take hold and worsen.
Additionally, aspirin killed healthy people outright (“well in the morning, dead by evening”) because of medical ignorance of its toxic qualities.  Government, medical, and industry promotion came together to urge aspirin on the world, and multiplied the losses.  (And now coming to light is the corollary – natural practitioners who avoided aspirin and supported immune system function, had stunning success in saving lives.)
Vaccines are promoted as a miracle of modern medicine, just as aspirin was touted in 1918.  The WHO even promotes vaccines as the means to save the world from another flu pandemic like 1918.  But 1918 wasn’t a flu pandemic in the first place!  To counter how many times people were wrongly told that a virulent virus (or flu) killed millions in 1918, it bears repeating that there was no flu pandemic in 1918 and that there has never been a flu pandemic in human history that killed millions.
Instead, 1918 appears most likely to have been a pharmaceutical disaster of global proportions based on global distribution of aspirin and global advertising.
Vaccines make no sense as any response to 1918 unless the drug industry wishes to replicate the calamity of 1918 by intensely promoting yet another pharmaceutical industry product which even more severely suppresses the immune system than aspirin and can permanently damage it.  Today the pharmaceutical industry has gone further than promotion, and has gotten laws in place which mandate their “immune system damaging” product to everyone, without exception.
The millions of 1918 deaths offer a dire warning against any product – no matter how much said to prevent death, no matter how much fear-mongering, no matter how much government agencies, medical authorities, or industry spokespeople urge – that tampers with the immune system.
Vaccines don’t just tamper.  Vaccines are cluster bombs.
http://coto2.wordpress.com/2011/06/28/vaccines-as-%E2%80%98cluster-bombs%E2%80%99/