Showing posts with label Natural News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Natural News. Show all posts

Sunday, September 15, 2013

NATURAL NEWS EXPOSES SECRET VACCINE INDUSTRY TIES AND MILITARY INVOLVEMENT WITH INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE, REVEALS FATAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AT LOM

Originally published August 29 2011

NaturalNews exposes secret vaccine industry ties and military involvement with Institute of Medicine, reveals fatal conflicts of interest at IoM

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor

(NaturalNews) The Institute of Medicine is suddenly in the news following the release of its vaccine "adverse events" research which found that MMR vaccines actually cause measles, seizures and anaphylactic shock. The old media predictably distorted the story and used it to deceptively announce that "vaccines are not linked to autism!"

In falsely reporting this study from the IoM, however, the old media reporters never bothered to even read the adverse reactions report. Nor did they ask a few simple questions such as "Who is funding the Institute of Medicine? And what is the agenda of the IoM?"

Today, NaturalNews publishes a stunning story about the IoM which reveals this government-created non-profit to be a key player in the military medical complex involving a shady network of weapons manufacturers, the Department of Homeland Security, top pharmaceutical companies and population control globalists such as Bill Gates. Here, we expose who's giving the IoM money and why the actual sources of funding behind the IoM destroy any credibility it once claimed to have on the subject of public health.

We've already published the first honest assessment of the IoM's report in a news item posted yesterday:
http://www.naturalnews.com/033447_Institute_of_Medicine_vaccines.html

That story takes an honest investigative look at the IoM and what its report really says. The old "dinosaur" media, as usual, has predictably twisted this story around and falsely claimed that it gives vaccines a clean bill of health. Only NaturalNews (and other alternative media organizations) dares tell the truth while questioning the IoM's financial ties and funding sources. The entire mainstream media blindly accepts the IoM's "authority" as beyond reproach, neglecting to conduct basic journalism and follow the money as NaturalNews is doing.

By the way, you can view the IoM's full report for yourself at:
http://naturalnews.com/files/Adverse-Effects-of-Vaccines-Evidence-Cau...

Why does the truth about the Institute of Medicine really matter?

Because the IoM is positioned by the federal government as an independent, "prestigious" organization whose decisions are based on scientific facts. When the U.S. government rolls out its upcoming mandatory vaccination requirements, it will cite the Institute of Medicine as the source that said vaccines were safe (even though that's a lie).

The FDA, for example, cites the Institute of Medicine is setting its own vaccine policies (http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineS...). The USDA also turns to the IoM for its recommendations on things like school lunch programs (http://www.fns.usda.gov/cga/pressreleases/2009/PR-0516.htm).

Even more to the point, President Obama's recent demand that health insurance companies pay for birth control medication was based on the Institute of Medicine's recommendation (http://www.lifenews.com/2011/08/01/obama-admin-will-force-coverage-of...). It was the IoM that put forth the guidelines to "require new health insurance plans to cover women’s preventive services" including "FDA-approved contraception methods and contraceptive counseling."

Even the CDC commissioned the IoM to study the control of viral hepatitis infections, after which the CDC quickly advised that all infants should be injected with multiple hepatitis vaccines "...as soon as they are stable and washed." In this same set of recommendations, the IoM advised that students who are not vaccinated against hepatitis B should not be allowed to attend school. (http://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/IOMnews.htm)

The IoM, in other words, is the go-to organization for the setting of government health policy. Never mind the fact that the IoM is two-thirds funded by government itself and also takes money from the world's top vaccine manufacturers. The conflicts of interest within the IoM are not merely notable, but severe conflicts of interest. They are so prominent, in fact, that no person in their right mind should believe a word the IoM says about vaccines, yet both the government and the mainstream media is positioning the IoM as (somehow) being a trustworthy independent non-profit that tells the truth about vaccines.

Even the Washington Legal Foundation (http://www.wlf.org), a group that advocates free choice in health care (and personal freedom in general), charged that the FDA could not legally accept recommendations from the Institute of Medicine because the committee members put forth by the IoM did not meet the lawful requirement of being "fairly balanced."

"Using advice from a committee that lacks fair balance encroaches upon Congress' mandate that each Advisory Committee should be representative of a broad range of viewpoints and should include affected individuals," said WLF Chief Counsel Richard Samp after filing WLF's Citizen Petition. (http://www.policymed.com/2011/07/institute-of-medicine-fda-510k-advis...)

This is where the danger really lies. Everybody else in government listens to the IoM and usually adopts its recommendations as public health policy. And yet the IoM is actually run and financed by a complex network of globalists and vaccine promoters, as you'll see below.

Because of the IoM's unchallenged influence in setting public health policy, we are all being set up for a military-run mass vaccination campaign funded in part by the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Defense, and relying on vaccine-tracking information technology from companies like Northrup Grumman, a weapons manufacturer with a history of illegal international arms trafficking. (More details below.)

This is what vaccines have become in America today: A military agenda against the People. And the IoM sits at the hub of influence for this diabolical command center. This is all explained in more detail in the rest of this story, as well as in upcoming stories about the IoM slated for publication here on NaturalNews.

Please share this story far and wide so that your friends and colleagues can learn the truth about the IoM and where its money really comes from.

I wish to thank the NaturalNews Facebook fans who conducted much of this research to help us find the truth behind the Institute of Medicine (www.Facebook.com/HealthRanger)

The IoM's secret ties to the military and weapons manufacturers

The Institute of Medicine was created by Congress in 1970. On its website, the IoM claims "we do not receive direct federal funding for our work," which as you will soon see is a highly misleading statement, given that 64.9% of the IoM's funds actually come from the federal government.

NaturalNews learned that the IoM is funded by the Who's Who of the most evil corporations, non-profits and government organizations involved in things like secret medical experiments on humans, global population control agendas, the spread of degenerative disease, international arms trafficking and crimes against humanity (see list below).

The IoM is also blatantly deceptive about where its funding comes from. While its website claims it does not receive federal funding for its work, an investigation by Senator Coburn's office reveals that 55% of the IOM's funding comes from the government (http://coburn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/rightnow?ContentRecord_id=a...). This number varies year to year, of course, and we've found documentation showing this number to be as high as 64.9%.

It all begs the question: Why would the IoM try to hide the fact that it receives so much money from the federal government? We'll get more into that later, but first, check out some of the government organizations from which the IoM receives its money:

Government departments that fund the IoM

• Department of Homeland Security
• Department of Defense
• Department of Health and Human Services
• EPA (in charge of allowing corporate pollution of our nation)
• USDA (the pro-Monsanto, pro-GMO sellout)
• Social Security Administration

In all, two-thirds of the IoMs money comes from government sources, several of which are military and "homeland security" related. What this reveals is that various government agencies function as "shell companies" to funnel money into the IoM. More than five percent of the IoM's funding comes from the Department of Defense, and a further 3.6% comes from the Department of Homeland Security.

It makes you wonder: What does WAR have to do with medicine? Well, everything, as you'll soon see. In 2008, the Department of Homeland Security requested that the IoM conduct a workshop entitled, "Medical Preparedness for a Nuclear Detonation in a Major U.S. City". (http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2009/NucEventPrepWS.aspx) The workshop "assessed the ability of emergency services, healthcare, and federal, state, and local authorities to respond to a nuclear weapon equivalent to 10 kilotons of TNT detonated during a workday in a central business district of a large U.S. metropolitan area."

The IoM even managed to twist the terror attacks of 9/11 into its own pro-vaccine agenda, issuing a strongly worded press release on November 5, 2011 which declared, "[America's] capacity to develop, produce, and store vaccines to deal with these agents is inadequate to meet the nation's needs." The IoM then recommended the creation of a "National Vaccine Authority" which would be used to spearhead the U.S. government getting into the vaccine manufacturing business in what the IoM calls a "the creation of a government-owned, contractor-operated national vaccine facility." (i.e. the federal government actually manufacturing vaccines, mandating their use, outlawing lawsuits against vaccines and imprisoning those who refuse to take them). (http://www.iom.edu/Global/News%20Announcements/Statement-from-the-IOM...)

The IoM describes this "vaccine authority" as a group that "...could become a source of appropriate reliable information to the media health care personnel, policy-makers, and the public." (i.e. a vaccine propaganda Ministry of Truth.)

Vaccinating all the children of the world

Immediately following this recommendation, the IoM published a document called "The Children's Vaccine Initiative: Achieving the Vision" which it describes as "...an international endeavor to ensure that children throughout the world are immunized. One of the best opportunities to address the growing problem of immunization in the United States ...lies in marshaling the vaccine development and production efforts in the United States and abroad." (http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=2224)

In addition to receiving funds from the DOD and DHS, the IoM also allows its key reports to be reviewed by weapons manufacturers before they are published. Its recent report on vaccine adverse reactions, for example, was reviewed by Sam Shekar from the military defense contractor Northrop Grumman, a weapons manufacturer and military technology engineering company that has been caught engaging in illegal international arms trafficking by the U.S. State Department. A subsidiary of Northrup Grumman "provided portions of the computer source code of Air Force One to a Russian company in 1998," reports Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Grumman#Scandals).

Northrup Grumman also illegally sold computer guidance systems to Angola, Indonesia, Israel, China, Ukraine and Yemen.

On the health front, Northrup Grumman was awarded a key role in a $5 billion grant from the CDC to run a "public health" information technology program. (http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.html?d=203128)

What's a public health information technology program? It is a cybersecurity technology system used to track people who have been vaccinated while monitoring the spread of infectious disease (which the IoM admits is caused by the vaccines themselves). Remember: Most people who are diagnosed with infectious disease are the very same people who were vaccinated against those diseases! (http://www.naturalnews.com/033399_vaccines_measles.html)

We suspect this technology will likely be used to track and enforce an upcoming militarized mandatory vaccine agenda in much the same way that IBM sold its technology to the Nazi regime in World War II to track Jewish prisoners as they were hauled off to concentration camps. (http://www.ibmandtheholocaust.com/home.php)

In this, we have a blurring of the lines between military and medicine. The theme that emerges from all this is that conventional medicine is being militarized, and the signs of that are all around us (see more, below). For example, the FDA has stepped up its armed raids on innocent dairy farmers, using "shock troop" tactics while borrowing techniques from the KGB to build a network of spies and infiltrators (http://www.naturalnews.com/033428_FDA_secret_war.html).

That an international arms trafficker is now being given grant money by the CDC to engineer and run a "CDC global health mission" is a direct admission of the globalist agenda behind these criminal organizations. The Northrup Grumman press release on this admits that the contract work with the CDC will be conducted in "50 countries around the world" involving "20 business and university partners."

Private sources of money for the Institute of Medicine

While 64.9% of its funding comes from the federal government, 32.7% comes from private sources. See page 55 of the following report to see for yourself:
http://www.naturalnews.com/files/PresSupplement-2010.pdf

That funding chart does not break down private sources of money for the IoM, so once again, NaturalNews turned to its researchers on Facebook (www.Facebook.com/HealthRanger) to find out where all this money is actually coming from. The answers may surprise you.

For starters, the IoM receives funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation which is, of course, a total front for vaccines and Big Pharma. This alone completely biases the IoM, as having financial ties with this foundation is really like being caught with your hand in the vaccine cookie jar.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, for those who don't know, recently declared this to be the "decade of vaccines" (http://www.naturalnews.com/031703_Bill_Gates_vaccines.html) and pledged ten billion dollars to make sure that every man, woman and child on the planet is injected with at least one vaccine shot, and preferably several.

And what's the real agenda behind this? Bill Gates has publicly stated that vaccines will be used to reduce the global population. Specifically, he says, "The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent." (http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html)

Watch the video of Bill Gates saying this at:
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A155D113455FAC882A3290536575C723

By accepting money from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Institute of Medicine is taking part in a campaign of human genocide while exposing its own pro-vaccine interests.

Bill Gates is also listed as a "lifetime contributor" to the IoM, giving "$100,000 or more" to the IOM. Other contributors who gave big money to the IoM include Margaret Hamburg, the current head of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the same agency currently masterminding KGB-style infiltration schemes and running an illegal network of government spies to destroy the raw dairy industry (http://www.naturalnews.com/033428_FDA_secret_war.html).

In addition, globalist Ted Turner is listed as a major contributor. See the rest of the names of those who give money to the IoM at the end of this article -- it's a who's who of globalists, financial elitists, pharma executives and vaccine pushers, including people with links to the Federal Reserve, JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, the Rockefellers and more.

Junk food promoters found funding the Institute of Medicine

Beyond taking money from the genocidal Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the IoM is also funded at times from junk food and soda companies such as PepsiCo (http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2009/Mitigating-Nutritional-Impacts-of-Glo...)

Even more interestingly, a prominent board member of PepsiCo is also a member of the Institute of Medicine: Victor J. Dzau, a conventional medical doctor, has made the rounds through Harvard Medical School and Duke University. Now he's a top PepsiCo board member while simultaneously serving as a director of these three pharmaceutical and medical device companies: Genzyme Corporation, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc. (http://www.pepsico.com/Company/Board-of-Directors-and-Committees.html...) and (http://people.forbes.com/profile/victor-j-dzau/3593)

Ring any bells? Medtronic is the company that was recently caught bribing a doctor to fabricate study results (http://www.naturalnews.com/027745_Medtronic_fraud.html). The company was also caught up in allegations of Medicare fraud (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/23/business/23device.html) and was sued by 22 states, which said Medtronic "unlawfully and unabashedly developed, marketed and promoted its biliary stent medical devices for uses unapproved by the Food and Drug Administration." (http://www.kare11.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=842852)

Genzyme Corporation, on which Victor Dzau also sits as a board member, is a fully owned subsidiary of Sanofi-Aventis (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genzyme), one of the world's largest vaccine manufacturers and the company that recently received hundreds of millions of dollars in government vaccine contracts for the hyped up H5N1 swine flu scare. Sanofi-Aventis admittedly received $192.5 million from the U.S. government just in the second quarter of 2008 to produce vaccines for a "pandemic stockpile" against H5N1 (http://en.sanofi.com/press/press_releases/2008/ppc_14662.asp).

Genzyme produces medicines to treat kidney disease, one of the most common side effects of flu vaccines. (http://www.naturalnews.com/030299_vaccination_flu_shots.html) In this way, the more vaccines that are injected into people, the more kidney disease drugs can be sold by companies such as Genzyme.

And yet Genzyme has questionable health practices itself! In June, 2009, Genzyme's U.S. manufacturing plant was shut down due to the discovery that it suffered from a "viral contamination." In November of 2009, "fragments of stainless steel, rubber, and fiber-like material were discovered in some of Genzyme's drugs," after which the FDA said all those drugs should stay on the market because there was no evidence of any side effects from those materials. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genzyme#Contamination_incidents)

Not surprisingly, Victor Dzau was named a "Distinguished Scientist" by the American Heart Association and was the recipient of the 2004 Max Delbruck Medal, Berlin, Germany. Max Delbruck, by the way, was a German biophysicist who promoted the idea that living systems (including humans) are nothing more than biochemical robots, and his work on molecular genetics was, in many ways, ground-laying work for modern-day genetic engineering (GMOs).

Other board members of PepsiCo, in case you were curious, read like a who's who of the most powerful (and some say "evil") corporate giants in the world: JP Morgan, Colgate-Palmolive, Google, Novartis AG and more.

Beyond PepsiCo, the IoM also receives money from these producers of processed dead foods, fast foods and foods made with (collectively) hundreds of different synthetic chemicals and preservatives:

• Kraft Foods, Inc.
• Mars Incorporated
• McDonald's Corporation
• Mead Johnson Nutritionals

The IoM's ties to Big Pharma

In addition to its ties with junk food companies, the IoM receives millions of dollars in grant money from pharmaceutical companies, using that money to create new staff positions which claim to be "providing the nation with sound advice grounded in scientific evidence, to improve people’s health and well-being." For example, the IoM received this $2 million grant from a pharmaceutical company (Schaeffer): http://www.iom.edu/About-IOM/Support-IOM/Recent-Gifts.aspx

Schaeffer is a total pharma insider, according to Forbes Magazine, which lists him as the director of pharma giant Allergan, Inc: http://people.forbes.com/profile/leonard-d-schaeffer/3035

Allergan is most famous for producing BOTOX, a cosmetic treatment made from a deadly viral strain best known for killing people through food poisoning.

In addition, the IoM has financial ties to Merck, Pfizer, Astrazeneca and nearly all the top pharmaceutical companies, most of which also profit from producing and selling vaccines:

• AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P.
• Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
• Eli Lilly and Company
• GlaxoSmithKline
• Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC
• Merck & Company, Inc.
• Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
• Pfizer, Inc.
• Sanofi Pasteur
• Sanofi-aventis
• Wyeth

In addition to promoting pharmaceutical interests, the IoM has also pushed its agenda of regulating dietary supplements as if they were drugs, thereby hoping to outlaw virtually all supplements sold on the market today (http://www.anh-usa.org/u-s-institute-of-medicine-study-urges-new-appr...).

IoM's huge conflicts of interest with vaccine producers

Notably, the pharmaceutical companies listed above represent the top vaccine producers on the planet, once again showing that the IoM has severe conflicts of interest in producing a report on vaccine adverse reactions.

This is like the fox guarding the hen house! If the IoM told the truth about the dangers of vaccines, it would risk losing a significant portion of its funding and discrediting many of its most prominent financial supporters. (It makes you wonder: Why didn't Forbes raise this question? Or the NY Times? Or Washington Post? Or any mainstream media organization? Why is real journalism dead in America today everywhere except in the alternative media like NaturalNews, which is fast becoming the most popular choice for discerning readers?)

In addition, vaccines cause the very health conditions which are profitably treated by the pharmaceutical products of these companies. Thus, today's entire medical racket of treating sickness and "managing disease" requires that disease to be propagated in the first place. Vaccines play a key role in causing immunological disorders, compromising the nervous system, damaging kidneys, promoting cancer and causing the very diseases that keep Big Pharma in business.

If you're skeptical of that, watch this stunning, jaw-dropping video admission of much of this from a top Merck scientist, the "father" of many modern vaccines, who openly admits that vaccines contain hidden cancer viruses:
http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=13EAAF22CDA367BB3C2F94D2CD90EF7B

The IoM's ties to foundations and globalist groups

The IoM also receives funding from other institutions (such as NIH) which are funded by government -- and they largely operate as pharma front groups to push more vaccines, more pharmaceuticals and more medications for Americas; often while downplaying any role of nutrients such as vitamin D.

Here's a list of some of the non-profit groups that donate money to the IoM. Note the presence of all the corporatists and globalists:

• W. K. Kellogg Foundation (tied to the Kellogg's cereal company)
• The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
• The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
• Merck Company Foundation
• The Rowe Family Foundation
• Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Global Impact Funding Trust, Inc.
• The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
• The Whitehead Foundation (ties to Goldman Sachs, and John C. Whitehead was a former board member of the Federal Reserve. He also oversaw the Whitehead family's fortune of investments in the Rockefeller Group.)

IoM's ties to globalist food and agriculture companies

The food and agriculture companies that give money to the IoM represent some of the most evil corporations in the world, including Monsanto which seeks to dominate the world food supply through its GMO seed technologies.

Here are some of the food and agriculture companies that financially support the IoM:

• Cargill, Inc.- sold ground turkey widely contaminated with salmonella, which resulted in fatalities (http://www.naturalnews.com/033283_ground_turkey_salmonella.html)

• ConAgra, Inc.- sued for falsely labeling GMO oils as "natural" (http://www.naturalnews.com/news_000223_ConAgra_sued_GMO_oil_fraud.htm...)

• General Mills, Inc. - engaged in deceptive food labeling (http://www.naturalnews.com/031053_General_Mills_Total_cereal.html)

• McDonald’s Corporation - sells Chicken McNuggets that contain an industrial chemical (http://www.naturalnews.com/032820_Chicken_McNuggets_ingredients.html)

• Monsanto Company - voted "most evil corporation" by NaturalNews readers (http://www.naturalnews.com/030967_Monsanto_evil.html)

• PepsiCo, Inc. - produces aspartame-laden diet soft drinks also made with high-fructose corn syrup. Uses MSG throughout many of its snacks.

As you can see, these companies aggregately support factory farmed animal meat production, dishonest and deceptive food labeling, "terminator" seed technology that destroys seeds and is contributing to the global spread of suicides by farmers, the promotion of obesity and diabetes through the use of high-fructose corn syrup, the neurotoxic poisoning of consumers through aspartame-sweetened beverages, monopolistic trade practices, abuses of the court system and much more.

If Hell had a board of directors, many of these corporations would have members sitting on it. And these are the members who financially support the Institute of Medicine.

Interestingly, the IoM also has financial ties to several health insurance companies who profit from sickness, disease and vaccines, including Aetna Inc. and Kaiser Permanente.

The IoM's financial ties to the sickness and disease industry

Not surprisingly, the IoM is funded by a large number of influential (and wealthy) organizations in the cancer industry, the diabetes industry, and the sickness industry in general.

Here are some of the national groups -- all of which profit from disease -- that funnel money to the Institute of Medicine:

• American Association for Cancer Research
• American Cancer Society, Inc.
• American Chemistry Council
• American Diabetes Association
• American Hospital Association
• American Medical Association
• American Nurses Association
• American Society of Clinical Oncology
• Association of American Medical Colleges
• College of American Pathologists
• Critical Path Institute
• Infectious Diseases Society of America
• National Association of Chain Drug Stores Foundation
• National Society of Genetic Counselors
• Oncology Nursing Society
• Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA)
• Task Force for Child Survival and Development

As you can probably tell, nearly all of these organizations are pro-chemical, pro-chemotherapy, pro-vaccine, anti-nutrition, anti-health freedom organizations that function as disease parasites on society, profiting from sickness rather than showing people how to be healthy. None of these organizations, for example, has yet to firmly promote vitamin D as a simple, low-cost, nearly-miraculous nutrient that can prevent cancer, diabetes, osteoporosis, depression, gum disease, kidney disorders and many other health conditions.

They are all steeped in the false mythology of western medicine and its drugs-pushing, profit-seeking agenda which includes the mass vaccination of the population.

IoM is headed by pro-vaccine globalists with ties to WHO, CDC

After learning who funds the IoM, you might still be wondering: Who runs the Institute of Medicine?

The IoM is currently headed by Dr. Harvey Fineberg, a globalist with ties to the World Health Organization, which of course heavily pushed its H5N1 swine flu vaccination charade through a "panel of experts" who were taking money from the pharmaceutical companies to declare a global pandemic when there wasn't one. The whole purpose of this conspiracy involving the WHO and the CDC was to sell more vaccines. (http://www.naturalnews.com/029481_vaccines_WHO.html)

Dr. Fineberg also has ties to the CDC, the other group pushing vaccines and killing children through its incessant infectious disease mongering. The CDC's own vaccine research scientist, Poul Thorsen, has been indicted under federal law for alleged money laundering (http://www.naturalnews.com/032216_Thorsen_fraud.html). See the Web of Alleged Fraud involving the CDC, Merck, Thorsen and medical journals at: http://www.naturalnews.com/files/Web-of-Alleged-Fraud.pdf

In 1988, Dr. Fineberg received the Joseph W. Mountin Prize from the CDC. Fineberg is, predictably, a Harvard graduate where he earned a conventional medical degree from Harvard Medical School plus a Ph.D. in government from a Harvard graduate school. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey_V._Fineberg) Harvard is a source for many of the most despicable medical globalists who promote things like GMOs, vaccines and even chemotherapy for children.

Fineberg also served as the president of the Society for Medical Decision Making, a Big Pharma front group that promotes the use of vaccines and pharmaceuticals while claiming to follow a "scientific" decision process. This group receives money from the PhRMA Foundation, a total Big Pharma money funneling outfit that uses its grant money to influence the work of other organizations. It is funded by Merck, Eli Lilly, Bayer, Astrazeneca, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline and all the big pharmaceutical players.

Dr. Fineberg is a pro-vaccine globalist who even describes the 1976 swine flu vaccination fiasco which killed hundreds of Americans and damaged thousands from vaccine side effects a "qualified success" because it resulted in 40 million Americans being vaccinated. The way these vaccine pushers think, the more people get vaccinated, the better... no matter how many people die in the process. They literally do not seem to mind sacrificing the lives of innocent people as long as more vaccines can be injected into the masses.

To this day, the IoM still will not openly admit that the 1976 swine flu vaccines killed anyone at all. In fact, the IoM was instrumental in laying out the false fairy tale that swine flu vaccines were never responsible for Guillain-Barre syndrome. As the totally discredited government website Flu.Gov explains:

"The Institute of Medicine (IOM) conducted a thorough scientific review in 2003 and concluded that people who received the 1976 swine influenza vaccine had a slight increased risk for developing GBS. Scientists have multiple theories on why this increased risk may have occurred, but the exact reason for this association remains unknown." (http://answers.flu.gov/questions/4204)

In other words, they swept it under the rug and now pretend such a link doesn't exist.

A total Big Pharma cesspool of money, influence and quackery

Essentially, what we're looking at here with Institute of Medicine, its director, its funding sources and its laughably unscientific conclusions is an orgy of Big Pharma money and influence peddling masquerading as scientifically-grounded public health.

When the IoM recently issued its report on vaccine adverse effects, what it was essentially doing was running interference for all its financial supporters which are, of course dominated by vaccine manufacturers and dubious government organizations such as the Dept. of Health and Human Services which oversees the criminal U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

The point of all this is to spread the fabricated story that "vaccines are essentially safe" and thus there is no harm in mandating that the entire population be injected with them.

That's what's coming soon, you see: A mandatory vaccination policy which will no doubt cite this IoM report as being a "credible" and "scientific" review of all the evidence concerning vaccines. Such a claim would be, of course, completely laughable if it weren't dealing with life and death issues.

Countless children are killed every year by vaccines, and many more become autistic after their nervous systems collapse in the hours or days following vaccine injections. And yet what's clear from all the attacks, the lies, the cover-ups and the total criminal corruption from the medical industry that we've seen over the past couple of years is that the medical military establishment is desperately trying to destroy or dismiss all the evidence linking vaccines to autism.

This IoM report is essentially the work of vaccine industry cover-up con artists and quacks who are protecting their financial sponsors: the vaccine manufacturers.

Is anyone really surprised?

List of other big-money contributors to the IOM

Who else supports the Institute of Medicine? Here are some of the biggest individual contributors. NaturalNews has not yet had the time to research the backgrounds and globalist ties of these individuals. If you recognize any of these names as being involved in the vaccine industry, the banking industry or the military industrial complex, please let us know so we can update this article:

John Abelson
Bruce and Betty Alberts
Rose-Marie and Jack R. Anderson
John and Lise Armstrong
Richard C. and Rita Atkinson
Norman R. Augustine
Francisco J. and Hana Ayala
William F. Ballhaus, Sr.
Craig and Barbara Barrett
Jordan and Rhoda Baruch
Warren L. Batts
Stephen D. Bechtel, Jr.
Kenneth E. Behring
C. Gordon Bell
Elwyn and Jennifer Berlekamp
Diane and Norman Bernstein
Mrs. Elkan R. Blout
Harry E. Bovay, Jr.
David G. Bradley
Donald L. Bren
Sydney Brenner
Fletcher and Peg Byrom
Russell L. Carson
Ralph J. and Carol M. Cicerone
A. James Clark
James McConnell Clark
Dale and Jeanne Compton
Roman W. DeSanctisa
Robert and Florence Deutsch
George and Maggie Eads
Robert and Cornelia Eaton
Richard Evans
Harvey V. Fineberga and Mary E. Wilson
Tobie and Dan Fink
George and Ann Fisher
Harold K. and Betty A. Forsen
William L. and Mary Kay Friend
Eugene Garfield
William H. Gates, III
T. H. Geballe
Penny and Bill George
Nan and Chuck Geschke
Bernard M. Gordon
Barbara N. Grossman
Corbin Gwaltney
Margaret A. Hamburg and Peter F. Brown
William M. Haney, III
Michael and Sheila Held
Jane Hirsh
M. Blakeman Ingle
Joan and Irwin Mark Jacobs
Robert L. and Anne K. James
Anita K. Jones
Thomas V. Jones
Trevor O. Jones
Kenneth A. Jonsson
Yuet Wai and Alvera Kan
Fred Kavli
Cindy and Jeong Kim
Olga Kirchmayer
Frederick A. Klingenstein
William I. Koch
Jill H. Kramer
John W. Landis
William W. Lang
Geralda and Doris Laubach
Whitney and Betty MacMillan
William W. McGuirea
Burton and DeeDee McMurtry
Richard and Ronay Menschel
Dane and Mary Louise Miller
Mrs. G. William Miller
George and Cynthia Mitchell
Gordon and Betty Moore
Joe and Glenna Moore
David and Lindsay Morgenthaler
Richard M. Morrow
Philipa and Sima Needleman
Gerda K. Nelson
Ralph S. O’Connor
Peter O’Donnell, Jr.
Kenneth H. Olsen
Doris Pankow
Lawrence and Carol Papay
Jack S. Parker
Shela and Kumar Patel
Percy Pollard
Robert A. Pritzker
Dr. and Mrs. Allen E. Puckett
Ann and Michael Ramage
Simon Ramo
Carol and David Richards
Anne and Walt Robb
Henry M. Rowan
George Rowe, Jr.
Jack W.a and Valerie Rowe
Mrs. Joseph E. Rowe
William J. Rutter
Stephena and Anne Ryan
Jillian Sackler
Raymond and Beverly Sackler
Henry and Susan Samueli
Bernard G. and Rhoda Sarnat
Leonard D. Schaeffera
Wendy and Eric Schmidt
Sara Lee and Axel Schupf
Shep and Carol Ruth Shepherd
Melvin I. Simon
Georges C. St. Laurent, Jr.
Charlotte and Morry Tanenbaum
Ted Turner
Leslie L. Vadasz
Roya and Diana Vagelos
Charles M. and Rebecca M. Vest
John C. Whitehead
Wm. A. Wulf
Alejandro Zaffaronia
Janet Zucker and Jerry Zucker

Share this story

We need your help to spread the word about vaccines, drug makers and the outrageous conflicts of interest at the Institute of Medicine.

Please share this story on social networks and websites. Forward it to your friends or even post it on your website (with proper credit and a link back to NaturalNews, please).

NaturalNews is, to my knowledge, the only news organization in the world that has taken the time to really dig into the financial ties of the Institute of Medicine. All the other mainstream media presstitutes have long ago surrendered to a globalist agenda and no longer practice anything resembling journalism. They merely regurgitate corporate lies, then call it "medical news."

But here at NaturalNews, we believe that the role of journalism in a free society is to ask the tough questions... to be a little pushy and look for the real story behind the P.R. announcements. It is sad that only the alternative media (which is quickly becoming the dominant media now) dares cover the truth about this story, but that's exactly why we need your help in getting this story more widely read by others.

This story can't be completely told, by the way, without mentioning the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, an elaborate scheme set up by the U.S. government to insulate pharmaceutical companies from lawsuits that should have been filed by all the parents of children damaged by vaccines. Think about this: Vaccines are so dangerous that the U.S. government had to set up an extra-constitutional court system just to make sure the American people can't seek justice against Big Pharma!

The vaccine industry is run by such a powerful cabal of medical criminals that even the U.S. Supreme Court says it has no jurisdiction whatsoever when it comes to the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. In other words, this kangaroo court is more powerful than the U.S. Supreme Court! And its sole purpose, of course, is to make sure vaccine companies can never be sued, even as their products cause widespread fatalities and neurological harm in children, including autism. (http://www.naturalnews.com/031484_Supreme_Court_vaccine_makers.html)

Check NaturalNews and InfoWars.com for more details

There's more to come in all this, too: NaturalNews is currently researching the military ties behind HHS and the medical industry, and we plan to publish a truly eye-opening article very soon that shows why the FDA (among other government agencies) is becoming militarized and conducting so many armed raids against innocents.

Watch for that news here on NaturalNews.com. In addition, you may see me appearing on the Alex Jones Show (www.PrisonPlanet.tv) this coming week as InfoWars covers this issue as well. (www.InfoWars.com)

Also check out coverage of this topic at www.NaturalNewsRadio.com where Robert Scott Bell is covering this issue with his fantastic daily radio show.

Thank you for your support and your interest in this topic.

Research documents cited in this article include

The President's Report Supplement - an overview of the IoM's finances (2010)
http://www.naturalnews.com/files/PresSupplement-2010.pdf

The Institute of Medicine's report on Vaccine Adverse Reactions (2011)
http://naturalnews.com/files/Adverse-Effects-of-Vaccines-Evidence-Cau...

You may notice that this document is 666 pages in length. It actually downloads as 667 pages, but the last page is blank, making it 666. Page 666, by the way, features the minutes from a presentation made by the Keck Center of the National Academies which offers talks with such titles as "The Immune Response to Vaccines and Natural Infection" and "Antibodies, Vaccines, Neuroinflammation, and the Blood-Brain Barrier". 

http://www.naturalnews.com/033455_Institute_of_Medicine_vaccines.html



Saturday, July 27, 2013

TWENTY QUESTIONS ABOUT SMOKING THAT WILL MAKE YOU QUIT

Thursday, June 27, 2013 by: S. D. Wells
(NaturalNews) Here are 20 questions that engage smokers and help them consider why they smoke cigarettes, just what they are really smoking, and why they can't quit. These questions are posed to students of the one-hour class "14AndOut," and then those answers are reflected upon and/or corrected by the teacher and inventor of the program, who reveals exactly how to quit in 14 days or fewer, naturally, without medications and without hypnosis. The 20 questions invite any and all smokers to think about the chemical knowledge associated with the addiction, consider the most common and popular behavior rituals to change, and finally to engage nutrition in order to "replace and replenish" a broken down digestive, breathing, and cleansing system, so you have energy and a positive outlook when you quit cigarettes for good.

THE TWENTY QUESTION "SMOKING" TRIVIA QUIZ

1. CAN YOU NAME FIVE HOUSEHOLD CHEMICALS IN A CIGARETTE?
Most students guess three ingredients and then they are stuck; "Tobacco, paper, and um, um, nicotine?" Some typical guesses include pesticide and formaldehyde. One student even guessed fiberglass once. Little do most people know though, commercial cigarettes contain a whole boatload of dangerous products. That's why smokers call them cancer sticks. Cigarettes contain ammonia for super strength nicotine and plastic (cellulose acetate) to make it burn evenly, and glass wool (fiberglass filter), not to mention bleach and herbicide weed killer (GMO RoundUp). These chemicals combine to give smokers a chemical "hangover" which in turn feeds the "nic fit" (nicotine) relief for the anxiety caused by the 4,000 plus chemicals, namely the top five listed above. Here's a clip from the "Stop Smoking King" on YouTube: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4Ua1YyCA5A).

2. WHY ARE CIGARETTES WHITE?
Most students have no clue as to the answer to this simple question. Trees are brown. Paper comes from trees. Cigarettes are rolled in white, bleached paper. You are smoking bleach. Smokers need detoxification help when they quit, especially to get bleach and pesticide out of their cleansing organs, like their kidneys, their pancreas and their liver. You cannot live without these vital organs. Big Tobacco knows this. Nutrition is the "Yellow Brick Road" to freedom from the commercial cigarette chemical "hangover." (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9G7OZPmlyCM)

3. BESIDES NICOTINE, WHAT MAKES CIGARETTES SO ADDICTING?
Students often say "the nicotine," but they can't really explain why. Many smokers light up to get rid of their anxiety, but what's causing the anxiety? Some smokers light up to get some "drive," thought boost or a little hit of confidence, but why is their confidence lacking? The majority of smokers just smoke because they are stressed out about life and how to live it, but again, why can't they quit when things get "good?" The addiction isn't to nicotine, it's to relief from the central nervous system overload of heavy toxins that are trapped inside of tar, which is trapped inside both lungs, and the vicious cycle that ensues by smoking another "stogie."

4. HOW DO TOBACCO LEAVES CONTAIN POISON?
Smokers can't answer this one. Most tobacco is GMO, genetically modified in a lab, so the bug killer and weed killer is put in the seeds, then grows INSIDE the plant, and so tobacco can also withstand more topical RoundUp and bug/worm killer, making commercial tobacco a pesticide bonfire of carcinogenic poison loaded up in every puff.

5. WHY DOES IT TAKE UP TO 15 YEARS FOR A CIGARETTE FILTER TO DISINTEGRATE?
Peel apart a cigarette "butt" or filter and you will find what looks just like fiberglass insulation. That's right, this is glass "wool," not some sponge wrapped up tight. If it were just paper and say, cotton, it would break up and dissolve after a few rainstorms if left outside. These microscopic "glass" shards collect in the lungs and damage soft tissue called epithelial. Also known as ground glass opacity, it shows up on CT scans:
(http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=3C93710BC1C921A18E787CEC445DA436)

6. WHY DO GIGARETTES BURN SO HOT, SO EVENLY AND NEVER GO OUT IN HEAVY WIND?
One student answered "the nicotine?" Actually, cellulose acetate, used to manufacture photo film, is carefully cross weaved into the papers. That's one reason cigarettes don't go out in the wind, and they burn evenly, never trailing up one side. Consider also why cigarettes burn at 1700 degrees during inhale. Have you seen the movie "Inglorious Bastards?" Photo film is highly flammable. This is an "efficient nicotine delivery device" (ENDD is the acronym - appropriately). This means you're smoking plastic. This is not regulated.

7. WHAT EFFECT DO ALL OF THE CHEMICALS HAVE ON YOUR BODY?
Smoking pesticide, herbicide and insecticide, mixed with ammonia and bleach, is definitely asking for a bad habit you can't quit without help. Most smokers who quit cold turkey go back to smoking within six months due to the long depressing chemical "detox," add in that they don't know anything about nutrition, and the CDC programs don't offer any help in this arena. Organic, more alkaline foods and water are necessary for speedy recovery and "killing the urge" to smoke. Ask nutritionists about mucuna and maca powders! (http://www.secrets-of-longevity-in-humans.com/mucuna-pruriens.html)

8. WHY DO THE PILLS, THE PATCH, AND NICOTINE GUM FAIL SO MANY?
Nobody knows the answer to this one in the classes. To make a long story short, they are nothing like what a smoker is going through after quitting, or while quitting, and they don't wean you properly. The patch and the gum give you about 5 percent of the dose of nicotine commercial cigarettes provide, so the whole quitting system is flawed from the beginning. The pills can block your hormones and dopamine, leading to feelings of suicide. People don't usually like that.

9. WHAT GOVERNMENT AGENCIES REGULATE THE POTENCY OF NICOTINE?
Nobody regulates it. That's part of the problem. Even if they did, they can't measure the real POTENCY of the nicotine after ammonia has been added to "free base" the vapor ready "nic fix." Have you ever read how many milligrams of nicotine you're getting? Take a look on the box and the carton, there's no information.

10. WHY DO CIGARETTE MANUFACTURERS USE AMMONIA WHEN MAKING CIGARETTES?
For a faster hit! Ammonia-treated nicotine allows the nicotine fix to reach the heart and the brain within three SECONDS. This is why people like "certain brands" so much. Even e-cigs can keep someone addicted to nicotine, and sometimes MORE of it. The stimulant relieves the smoker of the chemical hangover - the HOOK. This goes highly unregulated.

11. IS YOUR BTREATHING PATTERN BETTER WHEN SMOKING?
People say yes and no, but the real answer is yes. About 98 percent of smokers breathe a specific pattern when they inhale, hold, and exhale cigarette smoke, altogether different from their typical breathing pattern when not smoking. When people try to quit cigarettes, they quit this "ritual" which was relaxing them, even though the chemicals were pouring in. The breathing ritual is ignored, and this is a physical characteristic of withdrawal, the inability to relax, especially after meals (bad ones at that).

12. DO YOU HAVE A HAND TO MOUTH HABIT?
Absolutely you do. The typical pack has 20 cigarettes and figure 10 to 12 puffs per cigarette. A pack-a-day smoker puts his/her hand to their mouth, up and down, up to 250 times a day. A two-pack-a-day smoker is in a ritual of this up to 500 times a day. This must be replaced with water, raw nuts, superfood snacks and smoothies, organic chocolate, etc. There's plenty of quality supply at the NaturalNews store: (http://store.naturalnews.com/Superfoods_c_4.html)

13. IS SMOKING A FORM OF MEDITATION?
Some answer yes and they're absolutely right. Most smokers either change their environment to smoke, like going outside, or they get away from certain people, or they join certain people to talk about whatever the nicotine rush helps them consider. Once the nicotine is replaced with proper nutrition and pH balance of the body, meditation is easier and can be your "best friend."

14. WHY DO MOST SMOKERS ENJOY A CIGARETTE AFTER MEALS?
In the 1930s, Camel advertised that cigarettes help with digestion. They even showed doctors recommending their favorite brand, and one ad tells you to have one in between each course during Thanksgiving. The myth has lived and been perpetuated for nearly a century now. It's the breathing pattern that relaxes the smoker. Consider question 11 again here. Here's the unbelievable advertisement! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKMn-_aQoPk)

15. IS THERE ANY SUCH THING AS ORGANIC TOBACCO?
Of course, but nobody has been educated about the benefits here. Forget about the patch, the pills, the gum, and wean yourself off the strong stuff naturally, without the chemicals. Buy organic tobacco and roll your own.

16. WHAT IS THE ART OF BREATHING?
Students usually say "I don't know" to this question. Some suggest yoga or meditation. Here's an easy "trick" that helps thousands quit. Put two fingers together as if you have a cigarette, and inhale, as if you were smoking, and hold for a second or two and then exhale as if you're blowing smoke. Do this every time you would have had a cigarette, and for as many repetitions too. Don't give up the breathing ritual!

17. WHY DO PEOPLE OFTEN PUT ON WEIGHT AFTER THEY QUIT?
There are many answers to this one. The most popular ones are the lack of the stimulant, depression, anxiety and general negativity, but the answer they don't give is nutrition. Most smokers have virtually given up on nutrition since smoking is obviously so bad for you, so when they quit, they don't change a thing. No wonder.

18. HOW CAN YOU LEARN TO HATE CIGARETTES IF YOU LIKE THEM NOW?
You hear it all the time from smokers, "I hate these things!" So why don't they quit? It's because they really like the relief it gives them from smoking all that bug killer and weed killer, but they just don't know how to explain it. Smokers often fail to replace and replenish behaviors they like and organic food must come into play.

19. HOW WILL YOU DEAL WITH THE URGE AND WITH STRESS WHEN YOU QUIT?
Students have no answer for this one. Nutrition is the key, but no smoking programs really ever mention it, much less FOCUS on it, except for 14AndOut, which recommends considering advice from nutrition experts and naturopathic physicians. Also, watching documentaries is great for momentum and easy guidance. Check out "Food Matters" and "Forks over Knives." (http://premium.naturalnews.tv/Food_Matters__NN.htm)
(http://www.youtube.com/user/ForksOverKnives)

20. WHAT'S THE MAIN REASON THE PILLS DON'T WORK, BUT MAKES THINGS WORSE?
Medications like Zyban and Chantix have worked for some, but for most it's just horrific nightmares and heightened feelings of anxiety. That's right, the "side effect" of trying to quit with medicine is a heightened paranoia of exactly what has people smoking cigarettes all day in the first place. Needless worry, general depression, nervousness, sleeplessness, loss of libido, this is nothing new to smokers. Plus you now get a heightened risk of heart attacks! Who wants to shock that into mass effect next? Not too many. (http://www.naturalnews.com/032952_Chantix_heart_attacks.html)

(http://www.completemindcare.co.uk)

HEY SMOKERS, HERE'S THE 21ST QUESTION YOU SHOULD BE ASKING YOURSELF

How do I quit naturally, without medications, and stay smoke free for life? The Health Ranger, Mike Adams, introduces the concept and strategies of the 14AndOut program in a preview on NaturalNews TV and via a recorded Skype interview with the program's creator and teacher. Take a look into behavior modification and nutrition and live smoke free forever. Quitting smoking is personal. It is very emotional, physical and spiritual. You can become enlightened and make your life holistic and positive and move ahead with your goals. This is not just 20 questions about a habit. This is 20 answers for finding your ideal health again and living a long fruitful life. (http://www.14andout.com/)

Sources for this article include:

http://www.calmclinic.com/anxiety/treatment/acupuncture

http://premium.naturalnews.tv/Food_Matters__NN.htm

http://www.youtube.com/user/ForksOverKnives

http://www.appliedradiology.com

http://www.naturalnews.com

http://www.14andout.com/

http://www.completemindcare.co.uk

http://www.naturalnews.com/032952_Chantix_heart_attacks.html

http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=3C93710BC1C921A18E787CEC445DA436

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4Ua1YyCA5A

http://www.secrets-of-longevity-in-humans.com/mucuna-pruriens.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9G7OZPmlyCM 
http://www.naturalnews.com/040967_stop_smoking_cigarette_addiction_14andout.html
ETHICAL DONATORS, COMMUNITY  MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUAL AND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITYMIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS,DIVERSE, AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL.
FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com 

Saturday, July 6, 2013

USE IT OR LOSE IT: MENTAL ACTIVITY IN CHILDHOOD AND ADULTHOOD THWARTS DEMENTIA

Alice G. Walton, Contributor
It’s a curious but well-established fact that certain people whose brains look like they have Alzheimer’s disease upon autopsy didn’t actually have clinical symptoms to speak of during life. Researchers have tried to account for this disconnect for some time: the fact that one’s amount of brain “gunk” – the plaques and tangles that accumulate and clog the lines of communication between brain cells – doesn’t match one’s cognitive function so closely. In fact, a full third of people with significant plaques don’t have symptoms of dementia. This phenomenon has given rise to the “cognitive reserve” hypothesis, which suggests that some brains are better able to deal with breakdowns in machinery: Maybe they’re wired a bit differently, or they’re more “thinky” and active throughout life, so they’re able to better withstand their own breakdown.
It’s ironic, but possible. And, of course, difficult to prove.
But now a new study out in Neurology has added some fuel to the theory, finding that one’s cognitive activity throughout life – not just in adulthood, but also in childhood – is an important predictor of cognitive function, and one’s risk of dementia.
In the study, the team asked 294 people above the age of 55 how often they engaged in mental activities over the course of their lives, from childhood through the present. They also gave them cognitive tests to assess their brain function throughout the average six years of follow-up, along with neurologic tests. After the participants died, all of their brains were autopsied, for evidence of tangles, plaques, Lewy bodies, and infarcts or lesions.
What they found was cognitive decline was about 15% slower for the mentally active than for people who were less so. Interestingly, both mental activity in one’s later years and in the childhood years seemed to offer some protection against cognitive decline, suggesting that what we do as kids can contribute to whatever it is that fortifies the brain against aging and Alzheimer’s.
Also interesting was the fact that the greater part of the variability in cognitive decline was not dependent on the well-established markers. There’s still that great divide between what “should” be and what is. As study author Robert Wilson tells me, “That is the big question. In this study, markers of the leading causes of late life dementia accounted for one third of the variability in rates of cognitive decline, leaving two thirds unexplained.”
Though a bit mysterious, the “unexplained” two-thirds are also encouraging, since they suggest that what we do throughout our lives can greatly effect our cognitive function at the end of our lives, giving us a sort of power over the situation. “Better understanding of the factors contributing to this residual variability in cognitive aging not explained by dementia-related pathology and the neurobiological bases of the associations,” Wilson adds, “could suggest novel strategies for delaying the onset of late life cognitive dysfunction.”
In other words, like we’ve heard so many times before, use it or lose it. And as Wilson tells HealthDay, “Find a hobby that is sustainable: quilting, photography, acting in the theater, even learning Morse code. Physical activity is also important.” So is the issue of taking care of one’s mental health, since perceived stress and depression have also been linked to risk for Alzheimer’s disease. As always, the brain is no simple organ, and seems to need a good balance of variables. Focusing single-pointedly on one area apparently won’t cut it.
Follow me @alicewalton or find me on Facebook.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/alicegwalton/2013/07/05/use-it-or-lose-it-mental-activity-in-childhood-and-adulthood-thwarts-dementia/ 
ETHICAL DONATORS, COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUALAND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITYMIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS,DIVERSE, AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: >themikiverse@gmail.com 

Saturday, June 22, 2013

IF CARBON DIOXIDE IS SO BAD FOR THE PLANET, WHY DO GREENHOUSE GROWERS BUY CO2 GENERATORS TO DOUBLE PLANT GROWTH?

Originally published June 22 2013

If carbon dioxide is so bad for the planet, why do greenhouse growers buy CO2 generators to double plant growth?

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor

(NaturalNews) For only "pennies a day," any greenhouse owner can produce CO2 to help increase plant yields in their greenhouses. That's the message on CO2 generators sold by greenhouse supply companies across the United States and Canada. "1,500 ppm [of carbon dioxide] can be achieved... these generators automatically provide the carbon dioxide needed to meet maximum growing potential for only pennies a day," the ad says.

View it yourself in this picture taken from a greenhouse supply magazine:
http://www.naturalnews.com/images/CO2-Generator-Section.jpg

CO2 generators "improve plant quality" and "increase production." They're made in the USA and run on propane or natural gas, turning fossil fuels into carbon dioxide.

Why does this work to radically improve plant growth, health and yields? Because -- are you ready for the truth? -- CO2 is a plant NUTRIENT.

Nope, it's not a pollutant that threatens human civilization as has been ridiculously claimed by global warming doomsday pushers. CO2 actually increases plant yields, accelerates "re-greening" and improves reforestation of the planet. And while today's atmosphere contains only 400 ppm of carbon dioxide, CO2 generators can help raise that level to 1500 ppm inside greenhouses, thereby accelerating plant growth and food production.

Here's the ad so you can see it for yourself:



Is CO2 is so bad for the planet, why do greenhouses pay to produce it?

If CO2 was so terrible for the planet, then installing a CO2 generator in a greenhouse would kill the plants. But scientists and even governments actually recommend supplementing CO2 in greenhouses in order to boost plant growth and food production.

"The benefits of carbon dioxide supplementation on plant growth and production within the greenhouse environment have been well understood for many years," says the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food.

"CO2 increases productivity through improved plant growth and vigour. Some ways in which productivity is increased by CO2 include earlier flowering, higher fruit yields, reduced bud abortion in roses, improved stem strength and flower size. Growers should regard CO2 as a nutrient... increasing the CO2 level to 1,000 ppm will increase the photosynthesis by about 50% over ambient CO2 levels."

In fact, as recent scientific studies have shown, the slight rise in CO2 levels of the atmosphere has actually helped re-green deserts and arid areas, accelerating the growth of trees, shrubs and grasses which produce the oxygen human needs to breathe.

Attacking carbon dioxide is hate speech against Mother Nature

The more you really examine the scientific truth about carbon dioxide rather than the politically-charged "hate speech" against Mother Nature being spewed by people like Al Gore, the more you realize CO2 is a crucial nutrient for the Earth's environment and ecosystem. In fact, the vast majority of all the CO2 released into the atmosphere is produced by Mother Nature via animals in the ocean. Anyone who criticizes CO2 is attacking ocean life and condemning trillions of aquatic creatures who exhale carbon dioxide as part of their natural respiration. (Should they all be fined?)

As a society interested in reforestation, expanding the diversity of plant life, nourishing trees and re-greening deserts, we should no longer tolerate anyone engaged in hate speech against Mother Nature and CO2. Those who attempt to demonize this critical nutrient for the planet are engaged in a kind of hate-motivated racism against plants.

If it's not okay to condemn someone for being black, why is it okay for people like Al Gore to engage in endless hate speech against all the living beings that are green?

Besides, all those people who keep sounding the alarm on CO2 are being too negative all the time. Nobody spews more doom and gloom than Al Gore and the global warming crowd who paint apocalyptic pictures of Earth's future if we all don't start paying carbon taxes to the super rich. Stop being so negative!

They need to practice more positivity and repeat to themselves affirmations like:

"CO2 is a nutrient for forests."

"CO2 is produced by ocean life."

"CO2 brings balance to the global ecosystem."

"CO2 is to plants as oxygen is to humans."

"CO2 can help transform barren deserts into sustainable forests."

Perhaps by staying positive, the global warming fearmongers and doom-and-gloomers can calm down, take a few breaths (with extra CO2) and recognize that what's good for plants is good for the planet.

In fact, I'm going to hyperventilate after writing this article just to generate a little extra CO2 for the world. It's my gift to Al Gore.

For the record: NO, I don't support burning fossil fuels

The No. 1 criticism of this story by the brainwashed hoards of Al Gore cult worshippers will be that I must have been paid big bucks by the coal industry to write this article.

Don't be ridiculous. I'm the record -- for at least a decade -- having exhaustively condemned the burning of fossil fuels. Even though the CO2 they release into the atmosphere is actually a nutrient, they release many other pollutants such as sulfur and mercury (from coal). Scrubbers in the USA make U.S. coal plants the cleanest in the world, but China's coal plants are truly sickening pollution factories.

I also believe it's time to get humanity off the petrochemical habit and onto something cleaner and more renewable such as low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR), formerly called "cold fusion." Recent analysis has confirmed, yet again, that cold fusion is real and practical. Cold fusion could be harnessed and used in place of coal to heat large quantities of water that drive steam turbines which generate electricity.

In time, all of America's coal power plants could be switched over to cold fusion. Similarly, if improved battery technology comes along, gasoline-powered vehicles could be switched over to electricity, and if that electricity is powered by cold fusion, then it's clean all the way through the energy supply chain.

Fossil fuels are dirty business: they're dirty to extract from the ground, dirty to transport and dirty to burn. But the CO2 they produce is not a pollutant; it's a nutrient that's desperately needed by trees, grasses and shrubs all around the world. So while there are lots of reasons to oppose the burning of fossil fuels around our planet, CO2 is not legitimately one of them.

If all this talk makes you hyperventilate, then feel free to experience a hefty dose of self-inflicted guilt that you can alleviate only by sending all your money to Al Gore for all the carbon dioxide you're generating.
http://www.naturalnews.com/040890_greenhouses_carbon_dioxide_generators_plant_growth.html
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUALAND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY,MIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS,DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com  

Friday, May 10, 2013

TODAY TONIGHT PERTH - LYME FORUM

Their faces are wracked with anguish. Men, women and children, desperately ill with a disease they've been told doesn't exist. Strangers, with remarkably similar stories. Lyme disease usually starts with a tick bite. A tick with Lyme will transfer the infection through the skin, into the human blood stream. It'll move like a cork screw, often launching multiple attacks on different parts of the body. The effects can be devastating. There's often, but not always, a terrible rash. What you can't see are the headaches, fatigue, muscle pains, shortness of breath, lack of concentration and memory, sensitivity to light and noise.

So, why does no-one believe them? Well, Australian health authorities say there's no evidence that ticks here carry the infection. So most doctors won't diagnose Lyme disease, despite mounting evidence from patients who know they contracted it here. Last year, we reported on Bonnie Burns. So sick, she was barely able to walk. With Perth doctors refusing to acknowledge Lyme, Bonnie was forced overseas for treatment. Sadly, she says nothing's changed. "I'm still having seizures so at least once a month I'll head down to the local hospital because if I don't go they'll go why didn't you come down to the hospital when you had a seizure, we could've fixed you, we could've helped you out. Oh, every time I got there you make me walk back out that door, make me feel like an absolute idiot about myself, that I've got this sickness that's in my head." Bonnie says without government and medical support, patients are helpless. "We can't just keep helping ourselves with the invisible medication, the invisible money, the invisible information that we're trying to feed ourselves to give ourselves hope. The government seriously needs to get off their asses, stop worrying about stupid mining taxes and upping the GST, put that money into the medical system, seriously it's a joke."

Theda Myint is another sufferer we've reported on before. Once a broadcasting student with a bright future, Theda has been sick for 13 years, initially told she had Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. "Somebody saw the Today Tonight program and they said that girl's got Lyme disease." And she has. Like so many others, Theda had to send her blood overseas for testing. Her Mum, Carol. "The biggest thing for me is that Theda was incredibly depressed and talked all the time about taking her own life and not wanting to be alive and nothing helped in the medicines she was given anti-depressants or anything and then we're now having some treatment from a doctor in America and she's treating with pre-cursors to help the brain and Theda's depression has improved tremendously."

"I've seen just about every specialist in Perth trying to get to the bottom of why I was so unwell, this was before I had children, unfortunately I passed it on to two of my daughters and they are now very, very sick." Jenny's heartbreaking story shows what mis-information can do. "I'm really really angry, I'm gonna get upset now because if I had been treated appropriately when I was asking for help with the right anti-biotics I wouldn't have passed it on to my daughters."

There are entire families with Lyme disease and still health departments won't act. Kate says "My Mum was bitten in NSW, 27 years ago and she got the bullseye rash and because they denied it. Did she pass it onto you? Yeah. She went to the doctor with the rash and they were like I dunno, and they just sent her home and she's given it to her three children." The W.A. government maintains there's "little evidence" that Lyme occurs here and says treating people with long term anti-biotics can be "falsely reassuring" to people who believe that they have a chronic infection. But there IS hope and there are treatments available. No longer suffering in silence, this weekend they'll take to the streets, part of an international protest for Lyme disease awareness.

Perth's protest for Lyme Disease awareness:

Saturday, May 11

Perth Cultural Centre, Northbridge

12pm - 2pm

For more information on Lyme Disease:

www.karlmcmanusfoundation.org.au

www.lymedisease.org.au

ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUALAND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY,MIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS,DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com 

Sunday, April 28, 2013

ABRAHAM HICKS - HOW DO I DISCOVER MY PATH, GIFT, CALLING IN LIFE


ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUALAND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY,MIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS,DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com  

ABRAHAM: LOW SELF-ESTEEM AND SEPARATION FROM WELL-BEING?


ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUALAND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY,MIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS,DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com 

Thursday, April 18, 2013

INTERVIEW WITH DR SUZANNE HUMPHRIES ABOUT VACCINES


ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUALAND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY,MIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS,DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com 

VACCINATION BY SUZANNE HUMPHRIES, MD


After thoroughly examining both sides of the vaccination debate, Dr. Humphries unequivocally stands by the conviction that vaccines are an insult to life and health.
The history of vaccination is more complicated than most people understand.  The antivaccinationist movement is hundreds of years old.  It heated up in the 1800′s, when parents in the UK became fed up with watching their completely healthy infants and children die shortly after the smallpox vaccinations.  Parents and doctors risked losing their homes, their furniture and their livelihoods in order to beat back the deadly, disease-provoking smallpox vaccines. The vaccines were made from pus scraped off of diseased cows’ belly sores, contaminated with all sorts of disease matter.  The smallpox vaccine history is not what you think it is, if you think vaccines wiped out smallpox.  See this chapter for more information on the smallpox history.
Doctors and those administering vaccines are supposed to get “informed consent” before vaccinating.  This is not possible because the research has not been done to show that vaccines are safe beyond a few days or weeks.  Most vaccine studies do not use real placebos either, but use another vaccine as the control placebo.  See this  this article  as an example of how false placebos are regularly used. Needless to say, giving untested(no vaccine has undergone carcinogenicity testing for example, if you are wondering), often contaminated and with unproven-effectiveness vaccines is a “medical experiment” and violates the core principles of the Nuremberg – (informed and unambiguous consent)Code. Forcing people to take vaccines, whether by a proclaimed “emergency,” by a “public health” order from the WHO, or by threat of loss of rights over one’s children or of imprisonment, or by threat of being abandoned by the medical professionals supposedly providing care, removes consent, as does giving vaccines to those unable by age or mental status to legally consent. “Informed,” as well, is devoid of all meaning when people are tricked into taking vaccines by the use of false or frightening “information.”
I have found in my own practice, my own career and everywhere else, that the more one studies vaccination in-depth, the less they are inclined to vaccinate and the more comfortable they are not vaccinating.  Parents must learn the ways to take care of their children when they get the common childhood illnesses.  If they do, and allow their children to recover naturally, in most cases, the child will have long-term immunity.  Vaccination has robbed teenagers and adults of the opportunity to get re-exposed and continue with natural immunity.  As a result, mothers’ breast milk is devoid of the necessary antibodies they need to protect their newborns – even if they are vaccinated.  This is but one of the many consequences we face as a result of vaccination for measles and the other childhood illnesses such as rubella.
Medical schools do not educate doctors about the contents, dangers, effectiveness or necessity of vaccines. Medical doctors are fearful of the natural childhood illnesses because they don’t have any idea how to safely assist patients through them; and worse yet their limited treatment options often cause the diseases to be worse than they have to be.
Natural News interview with Suzanne Humphries, MD about vaccines. Natural News is the world’s largest natural health and wellness news organization.

If you would like to gain a better understanding of vaccination and what immunologists do not know, please read this short but very informative book, written by a PhD immunologist who bravely told the vaccine story from a well-educated standpoint.
            Vaccine Illusion
Please also read this short article from Standford Medicine, where the limitations of immunology are plainly spelled out  here.
The public is repeatedly deceived in order to maintain participation in vaccination.  All sorts of tactics are used. One of the most popular, is to say that everyone should get vaccinated in order to protect the unvaccinated.  This is commonly known as “herd immunity.”  HERE is an article I wrote on the subject.
The business of vaccination is highly profitable, and always has been.  In addition to the billions of dollars made by drug companies every year on vaccines, hospitals, doctors, and pharmaceutical companies prosper from the collateral damage of the barbaric and unscientific practice of vaccination.
Doctors parrot the advice, “We have to vaccinate them while they are young so the ‘take rate’ is high.”  A case-in-point is an article for which I was interviewed:
Bangor Metro: “A Shot to The Heart”
In this article, one of Maine’s supposed top experts is giving unscientific advice. We just learned from the PhD immunologist the above audio clip that the first 3 series of shots “don’t work.” But Maine’s vaccine expert says:
“Concerns about how much a young child’s immune system can handle at one time have prompted some parents to stagger vaccinations. But Fanburg points out that there is no medical data to support the practice, adding that it’s actually more beneficial to vaccinate infants, rather than wait until they are older. “Children have a better ‘take’ of vaccines in their first two years of life,” he says. “There is a higher rate of immunogenicity, which is the child’s ability to produce antibodies to the vaccine antigen.”
This statement is absolute nonsense.  This man lacks understanding as to how an infant’s immune system develops and why.  If he understood, he would be unable to utter such a statement. A baby’s immune system produces only very small amounts of IL-1B and TNFa.  There was a time when experts thought that this was simply a DEFECT in all newborn humans.  In 2004, Chelvarajan suggested that if vaccine pushers added various immune system kickers into vaccines, this would solve the problem and fix these perfectly normal children’s horribly deviant immune systems. All vaccines for Strep Pneumo, Hib and Meningococcal diseases have potent “adjuvants” – like irritating oils and aluminum – for this purpose, because without them, the baby’s immune system acts from the blue-print, sits there and does nothing – just as it’s supposed to do…”defectively” per the eyes of science.  How very arrogant, don’t you think?
However, by 2007, Chelvarajan was seeing things differently, and stated in the last paragraph, that whereas in the past, they had considered this a “defect”, they now considered it:
“an important developmental program” saying, “This anti-inflammatory phenotype may be beneficial to the neonate at a time when tissue growth and remodelling events are taking place at a rapid pace… thus the inability of the neonate to respond to infection with encapsulated bacteria may be the risk the organism takes for successful development.”
In order to adjust to the world appropriately, not only is the “anti-inflammatory phenotype” critical to an infant, but breast milk is also essential to protect the baby from toxin-mediated and other diseases while the immune system develops appropriately- in it’s own due time, according to the master plan of the creator.  That’s it!  The non-inflammatory position of the immune system is seriously altered by vaccines which shift the T cells in a direction that will react abnormally in the future, leading to all sorts of the childhood diseases many people think are normal.  But guess what…tubes inserted past the eardrums of a child are not a right of passage, inhalers should not be part of a lunchbox, epipens should not be necessary, type I diabetes in children is mostly avoidable.  Even antibiotics are completely avoidable.  In fact many non-vaccinating parents raise their children never needing drugs at all.   The sad part is that the public has been conditioned to accept such a skewed and backwards medical system, and that they think it is the soundest option available to them.  Nothing could be farther from the truth.  The healthiest and most disease-free infants, children, adults and elderly people are the unvaccinated.
If it is important for successful development of a baby to allow the RISK of infection by NOT allowing two key parts of the primary infection defence to “fire”, what’s the OTHER risk you might take, if you force an immune system to do something it’s not supposed to do…by causing repeated, chronic inflammation at the end of a vaccine needle? Peripheral inflammation and vaccine adjuvants, can; cause brain inflammation, create allergies, autoimmunity – constant inflammation all around the body – not just at the site of the injection… and… cause mitochondria to stop working properly.
So, you might now be thinking…if a baby’s default position to NOT respond to toxin-mediated bacterial diseases, what chance does a baby have to survive in this world? If you would like to learn more about this, read this 3 part blog series by Hilary Butler.
Infant immune system development.
While vaccine-enthused doctors may pull “peer reviewed literature” to supposedly prove their point, a closer look at their own literature invariably proves otherwise – as does a look at the sick population of vaccinated children they supposedly care for. Yet these types of ridiculous  myths are continuously propagated by parroting doctors who know almost nothing about vaccination, except what vaccines are due at what age, and who have never had the pleasure of caring for an unvaccinated child to see the enormous difference in health overall.

The unfounded fear over the illnesses supposedly prevented by vaccination is based on a history of unscientific theory and policy driven by profit, not health.  We must learn how to care for the common, immune building illnesses and not fall prey to the 200 year farce that injecting disease matter, animal matter, chemicals, metals and a host of other toxic elements could possibly promote health.  History demonstrates this practice to be an utter failure.  Do not be afraid of measles, because well nourished children who get adequate vitamin A fare just fine with measles.  Do not be afraid of whooping cough, because parents all over the world have been having a very easy time with whooping cough using high doses of vitamin C and homeopathy – but you will not read about them in “peer reviewed literature” and your doctor doesn’t know about them, because only sick children – the ones they see and often create – get counted in the morbidity statistics.  But the healthy children who uneventfully pass illnesses through them never touch the medical system and thus are not counted.  The morbidity of most childhood diseases comes from just a few things; infant formula, cow’s milk, common medical drugs, malnutrition, and vaccines.  All of these things are completely avoidable in the USA and many other countries and that is WHY we see so many healthy unvaccinated children when we look.
See how mortality for the common illnesses had declined significantly long before the vaccines were created.


There a few common misperceptions about NOT vaccinating:
  • You are putting other people at risk by not vaccinating.  At risk for what?  Chicken pox? Ask your grandmother if she knew anyone who died from measles.  Different diseases have different degrees of severity in different age groups.  But the bottom line is that the misperception that “if you don’t vaccinate you place others at risk” is based on an assumption that vaccinated people do not get the disease they were vaccinated for.  Did you know that a controlled study in school age children showed that of all the whooping cough that was diagnosed, over 86% of the children were fully vaccinated and up to date for the whooping cough vaccine? There are similar studies showing that mumps and measles breakouts predominately effect the vaccinated. People who are vaccinated have had their immune systems altered in a manner that often leads to susceptibility to other infectious diseases, and leaves them vulnerable to the disease they were vaccinated for due to a phenomenon called “original antigenic sin” whereby the antigen injected programs the body to react in a manner that is incomplete and inferior to the natural response to infection which is comprehensive and longer-lasting. Many vaccine enthusiasts like to invoke the term “herd immunity” to make the argument that the unvaccianted pose a risk to the vaccinated.  But the concept of herd immunity has no relevance to the vaccinated as it was coined in reference to natural immunity in populations and what level the least epidemics occurred.  There is no evidence whatsoever that having an 85% or 95% vaccination rate protects from outbreaks.  This theory has been disproven time and again in highly vaccinated populations.
  • The unvaccinated spread disease.  Actually it is the opposite.  Live vaccines are known to spread to close contacts.  Here is one recent example.
       Live vaccines can spread disease.
We also know that in pertussis (whooping cough) those who are vaccinated are more likely, due to original antigenic sin, to be carriers of the bacteria longer than the unvaccinated, even when asymptomatic. Full text article available here.
By 2004, James Cherry pointed out that adults, revaccinated against pertussis, don’t develop any antibacterial activity whatsoever. He went on to explain why. The current vaccines contains a few antigens, which create “original antigenic sin”, whereby the immune response to the vaccine is abnormal. That first learned response then becomes the default position the immune system takes, on future booster shots. So in the case of the whooping cough vaccines there are key protein virulence factors which have not been included in the vaccines including ACT, TCF, TCT, as well as BrkA and DNT. Because the first three are not included, the default immune response, does not prevent colonisation, and furthermore, Cherry stated that the “original antigenic sin” results in the vaccinated being unable to clear the bacteria from their lungs. The unvaccinated have immunity to all the front line virulence factors and very quickly clear the bacteria on re-exposure.
Mothers who have been vaccinated, may develop surrogate markers, but these do not guarantee efficient immune responses after exposure to the natural disease, because their first “learned response” was incorrect. Furthermore, they are still not sure “what” the surrogate marker actually is for pertussis.
There is similar information on measles, the other disease that has recently hit the media as a supposed danger to the population due to the unvaccinated.  But this information is not accurate, nor is measles a dangerous disease in people who have sufficient vitamin A.  Damien pointed out that the vaccinated are 5-8 times more susceptible to asymptomatic infection than the unvaccinated.  How then, are the unvaccinated solely responsible for the recent outbreaks in measles?
Many vaccines are said to be “attenuated” or modified live that supposedly do not infect, but over the decades we have seen how these attenuated viruses mutate once they are in a human and spread worse disease than what is being vaccinated for.  The oral polio vaccines in Nigeria are a case in point.  But this can happen with any attenuated viral vaccine.  The original Salk polio vaccines were supposed to be killed vaccines and yet they infected thousands of people, the household contacts and the community, killing and paralyzing over 200 people. This figure is thought to be a gross underestimation of the damage done.  It is not uncommon to see a child recently vaccinated for chicken pox develop shingles or chicken pox.  We see this often enough. Also I’ve seen shingles vaccine cause shingles in an elderly woman days after the vaccine was given.  These are highly contagious diseases, being spread because of the vaccine. Here are things to consider when you hear of an outbreak of an infectious disease:  how many of the affected were fully vaccinated and how many people died.  When these things are reported the results do not flatter the vaccines.
  • The terrible diseases that once plagued humanity will return if we do not keep up the vaccines.  We can see from the above graph that the mortality of these diseases was drastically declining prior to vaccination.  But in addition, you might want to know the more rational explanation for deadly disease decline in modern times.  It’s not vaccination. See the link below.
What is the evidence for a causal link between hygiene and infections?
Here is more information on vaccination myths:
        Vaccine Myths.
All the reduction even for TB, was achieved BEFORE any vaccines of any sort were offered, and most of the reductions for all diseases, were achieved before antibiotics became commercially available in about 1950 as well. So what did that? It wasn’t vaccines.
BTW, there never was a vaccine for scarlet fever. Scarlet fever and it’s resulting complication, rheumatic fever – has clearly been shown in the medical literature, to be nutritionally driven.  This is why if you do find someone who says they had scarlet fever, it is primarily in more impoverished and less educated groups throughout history. Some well educated people in stable social environments, without much money, will be on the scale of low susceptibility because it is really the nutrition and well being that count.  It just so happens that low education, homelessness and low money often co-exist. All of us carry Strep A regularly, but the well-fed amongst us don’t get scarlet fever, let alone it’s complication, rheumatic fever. The reason it’s a significant problem in the less educated, less nourished groups where poverty is rampant, is because poor nutrition, historically correlated with higher rheumatic fever.  This point is well studied enough to lay aside any concern over whether or not correlation implies causation.  In the case of infectious diseases, the low nutrition is not a cause per se, but it is a major preventive factor, that has led to enormous declines of morbidity and mortality with infectious diseases of all kinds, not just strep A and rheumatic fever, but also measles.
You may be aware of Dr. Andrew Wakefield, the doctor who was supposedly discredited after writing about Autism and vaccines.  Before you believe what you’ve heard on mainstream TV and media, please view this VIDEO and be aware that Dr. Walker-Smith and Dr. Wakefield were exonerated of the false claims made by Brian Deere, the journalist credited for defaming Dr. Wakefield.
Dr Wakefield and Dr Walker-Smith exonerated.
See this video here where Dr Wakefield so rationally and eloquently outlines the real issues involved in his attacks.
If you made it to the end of this, and would like to discuss vaccination further, Dr Humphries is willing to do that on the phone or in person.  Please schedule an appointment, where your questions can be answered, and you can be directed to the resources that best serve your individual needs.
http://drsuzanne.net/dr-suzanne-humphries-vaccines-vaccination/
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUALAND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY,MIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS,DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com