Wednesday, February 20, 2013

SOME SSRI'S TIED TO HEART RHYTHM PROBLEMS



Citalopram and two other antidepressants were associated with prolongation of corrected QT interval -- a marker of increased ventricular arrhythmia risk, researchers found.
In addition to citalopram, another selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), escitalopram, and the tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline were related in a dose-response fashion to corrected QT interval (P<0.05 for all), according to Roy Perlis, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, and colleagues.
Other antidepressants, including some SSRIs, were not significantly associated with prolonged corrected QT intervals; one agent, bupropion, was associated with shorter corrected QT intervals (P<0.05), the researchers reported online in BMJ.
"The question of whether patients for whom antidepressants will be prescribed should routinely have electrocardiograms before and/or after treatment starts cannot be addressed directly by this study," the authors wrote. "However, in terms of treatment selection, our results do suggest some variation within treatment class in terms of risk."
Citalopram in particular was the subject of a 2011 warning from the FDA about the association between higher doses of the drug and QT prolongation and torsades de pointes. The agency set the maximum daily dose at 40 mg and listed congenital long QT syndrome as a contraindication.
The FDA clarified the warning last year, removing that contraindication but stating that the drug was not recommended in that patient population. The agency also set a maximum daily dose of 20 mg for certain groups of patients, including those older than 60 and those taking an inhibitor of cytochrome P4502C19.
Perlis and colleagues explored the relationship between antidepressant use and QT interval in a general clinical population using electronic health records from the Partners HealthCare system, which includes Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and outpatient clinics.
The study included 38,397 adults (mean age 58.3) who had an electrocardiogram recorded 14 to 90 days after a prescription for an antidepressant or methadone -- which is known to prolong the QT interval -- from February 1990 to August 2011.
Overall, 20.4% of the patients had an abnormal or high corrected QT interval -- defined as 451 milliseconds or greater in men and 471 ms or greater in women. That rate was consistent across the various treatments examined in the study.
Increasing doses of citalopram, escitalopram, and amitriptyline were associated with prolongation of corrected QT interval -- and increasing doses of bupropion were associated with shortening of correct QT interval -- after adjustment for various clinical and demographic variables identified as potential confounders.
The authors noted, however, that the effect sizes were small.
Similar associations were not observed for other antidepressants, including fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, duloxetine (Cymbalta), mirtazapine, nortriptyline, and venlafaxine.
In a subset of 467 patients who had multiple electrocardiograms performed following dose changes, an increase in the dose of citalopram from 10 to 20 mg daily was associated with an average increase in the corrected QT interval of 7.8 ms (P<0.05). An increase in the dose from 20 to 40 mg was associated with a 10.3-ms bump in the corrected QT interval (P<0.01).
When the dose of bupropion increased from 100 to 200 mg, the average decrease in corrected QT interval was 19.2 ms (P<0.05).
"Our results suggest that, given its capacity to shorten QT interval, bupropion treatment might be a reasonable next step for patients partially responsive to citalopram who would otherwise require a dose increase," the authors noted.
They acknowledged that the study was limited by the lack of randomization of treatment and dose, which rendered the results subject to confounding. In addition, the use of electrocardiograms in patients taking antidepressants is not routine.
The study was supported by the NIH/National Library of Medicine and the National Institute of Mental Health.
Perlis has received consulting fees from or served on scientific advisory boards for Proteus Biomedical, Pamlab, Genomind, and RIDventures, and has received research grant support from Proteus Biomedical and royalties from Concordant Rater Systems. His co-authors reported relationships with the Medical Letter, the MGH Psychiatry Academy, CNS Response, Abbott Laboratories, Affectis Pharmaceuticals AG, Alkermes, Amarin Pharma, Aspect Medical Systems, AstraZeneca, Auspex Pharmaceuticals, Bayer AG, Best Practice Project Management, BioMarin Pharmaceuticals, Biovail Corporation, BrainCells, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CeNeRx BioPharma, Cephalon, Compellis Pharmaceuticals, Cypress Pharmaceutical, DiagnoSearch Life Sciences, Dinippon Sumitomo Pharma, Dov Pharmaceuticals, Edgemont Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Eli Lilly, EnVivo Pharmaceuticals, ePharmaSolutions, EPIX Pharmaceuticals, Euthymics Bioscience, Fabre-Kramer Pharmaceuticals, Forest Pharmaceuticals, GenOmind, GlaxoSmithKline, Grunenthal GmbH, i3 Innovus/Ingenis, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, Knoll Pharmaceuticals, Labopharm, Lorex Pharmaceuticals, Lundbeck, MedAvante, Merck, MSI Methylation Sciences, Naurex, Neuralstem, Neuronetics, NextWave Pharmaceuticals, Novartis AG, Nutrition 21, Orexigen Therapeutics, Organon Pharmaceuticals, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, Pamlab, Pfizer, PharmaStar, Pharmavite, PharmoRx Therapeutics, Precision Human Biolaboratory, Prexa Pharmaceuticals, Puretech Ventures, PsychoGenics, Psylin Neurosciences, Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Ridge Diagnostics, Roche, sanofi-aventis US, Sepracor, Servier Laboratories, Schering-Plough, Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Somaxon Pharmaceuticals, Somerset Pharmaceuticals, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Synthelabo, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Tal Medical, Tetragenex Pharmaceuticals, TransForm Pharmaceuticals, Transcept Pharmaceuticals, Vanda Pharmaceuticals, BioResearch, Clintara, Covance, Covidien, ElMindA, Ganeden Biotech, Icon Clinical Research, Lichtwer Pharma GmbH, National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia & Depression (NARSAD), National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Photothera, RCT Logic (formerly Clinical Trials Solutions), Shire, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Wolkers Kluwer, and World Scientific Publishing.
Primary source: BMJ
Source reference:
Castro V, et al "QT interval and antidepressant use: a cross-sectional study of electronic health records" BMJ 2013; DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f288.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Arrhythmias/37082?utm_content=
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUALAND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY,MIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS,DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

Monday, February 18, 2013

DO WOMEN REALLY NOT LIKE SEX?

October 8, 2012 Annie Stevens
If sensationalised and cunningly reported research is anything to go by, it seems that there are an awful lot of leisure activities that women are happy to participate in place of sex.  From eating chocolate, to reading questionable if intensely popular erotic literature, sleeping and watching movies, it would appear that sex does not rate highly in a woman’s list of favourite things to do. Indeed my primitive research, in the form of google predictive sentences, indicates that you could probably tap in ‘women prefer eating a cactus to sex’ and you would get some positive results. To add to the list, The Project tweeted about a new study last week claiming that 4% of women prefer grooming to shagging. Who knew that bikini waxes were so much fun? According to sex therapist Amanda Robb, the seemingly endless interest in surveying women’s attitude to sex comes down to the stereotypes that are still happily bounced around in our allegedly enlightened, post sealed section society– i.e. women lie back and think of England, men are always up for it.
“The myth that men prefer sex more than women will continually be popularised in the media due to each genders stereotyped sexual status; women are romantic and men are just plain horny …  I do think these studies give the message women are disinterested in sex, but I think this is portrayed by how the study is represented,” says Robb.
Stereotypes such as women seeking an emotional connection through sex and men wanting just, well, sex are each as damaging as the other says Robb.
Advertisement
“We also know that the notion men are 'always up for it' is one of the biggest misconceptions of all. … I believe the desire for sexual frequency, for sex to have an emotional connection, and for ones libido to be low is interchangeable between both genders.”
These studies remind me of a game  women used to play – which Sex and the City character are you. Or, more likely, who is Carrie and who is Charlotte, because nobody ever wanted to be Miranda or Samantha. Caustic writer AA Gill summed up the game best when he went on a Sex and the City tour of New York City for Vanity Fair magazine in 2009. The tour guide asked for a show of hands as to which character Gill's fellow SATC enthusiasts were most like.
“O.K., who’s a Samantha?” There are giggles, and a couple of birds at the back raise their hands. They might just as well have spread their legs. “Ooh! Sluts! My sort of girls!” The tour guide breathes into the microphone suggestively, and this huge intercontinental tour bus pneumatically, and empathetically, jerks itself into the traffic," writes Gill.
The problem with this example, and indeed the media’s interest in surveys that conclude that women don’t really like sex, is two-fold. For one, there  is the problematic word slut – a word that has been both the insult of choice by misogynistic shock jocks and reclaimed in slut walks around the world – but, two,  that there is something ‘naughty’ , giggle worthy and shocking about a couple of birds admitting that they, like Samantha Jones, like sex.
This attitude is depicted in movies where sex becomes a bargaining chip in a worn-in marriage (see for example the scene in recent film Salmon Fishing in the Yemen where Ewan McGregor has rather awkward sex with his wife who in post-coitus pats him on the back and says “that should do you for awhile”), in Bettina Arndt’s The Sex Diaries in which dozens of men said they didn’t get enough sex and in jokes among women about not wanting to have sex with their partners (“in the end I had to resort to sex” et al). Sex then becomes either something for the footloose and fancy free (i.e. not the settling down kinds) or a chore for the partnered up woman.  It’s little wonder that women say they would rather do X than have sex when those cheerful survey types come knocking.
As silly as these surveys may be, the danger lies in the stereotypes that underpin them. Sex is a normal, fun and important part of many romantic relationships, and indeed life. It's not always straightforward though, and intimacy issues that may arise in a partnership go far beyond any ‘would you prefer chocolate to sex’ survey. As sex therapist Amanda Robb points out, issues such as you or your partner losing interest in sex requires much “talking it out” to find out the real problems. And here’s a hint, it’s probably not because of that delicious Mars Bar in the fridge.
“Personally I don’t think anyone should have sex when they do not desire it to please another person. I think this idea has the potential to remove sex from being an intimate experience shared between loved ones, to seeming like a ‘chore’ or ‘responsibility’ in a marriage or relationship, and sex should never be a ‘task’ … The healthiest way to trouble shoot this is by talking it out. Tip: Find out what impacts each other’s libido in order to understand why each partner needs to fuel a healthy libido," says Robb.
If you pinpoint the trouble, says Robb, you can start working through to a solution.
“Once you understand the issues that may be affecting the desire to have sex you can support each other to alleviate them.  Reclaiming a happy sex life together can be as simple as changing a relationship routine i.e.: switching the time of day you have sex from night to morning, spending more time on foreplay, creating a relaxed environment and eliminating daily distractions from the bedroom. Relationship habits or ‘norms’ can be the unrecognised barriers impacting your partner’s libido. Once they are identified they can be changed to accommodate a more satisfying sex life for the two of you.”
It is true that some people might indeed prefer chocolate to sex and that is of course perfectly fine too. There will be times in your life – whether it be because of stress, children, ill-health or any other of life's challenges - that sex will be the last thing you feel like doing. But this fluctuates, and it will never be something that a media soundbite can properly capture. It is also heartening to think that despite what these surveys say, Amanda Robb - a woman who talks to people about sex for a living -  believes that women feel more confident about it than ever.
“I’d like to think that women are feeling more empowered to embrace their sexuality today and reclaim it for themselves," she says.
And that is undoubtedly far better than eating a cactus.
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUALAND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY,MIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS,DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

AUSTRALIA: VITAMIN WATER DOES NOT JUST CONTAIN VITAMINS AND WATER. SURPRISED?

26 January 2013 Article by Michael Bradley
The drink vitaminwater leaves out one key ingredient from its name: sugar. 31 - 32 grams of it per bottle to be exact. In 2009 individuals on behalf of the Center for Science in the Public Interest filed a class action in the United States against Coca-Cola over its subsidiary's product vitaminwater. Loaded with sugar, the plaintiffs claimed that the product's name and statements like 'vitamins + water = all you need' and 'this combination of zinc and fortifying vitamins can...keep you healthy as a horse' were misleading consumers by suggesting that they were making a healthy choice.
Coca-Cola sought to have the motion dismissed in 2010. Surprisingly, Coca-Cola argued that no reasonable person would really think that vitaminwater was healthy. This is a renowned defence known as puffery, dating back to the famed Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company case of the 1800s. Sometimes companies make statements relating to their products that are so ridiculous and outlandish that no one would actually believe them, bypassing accusations of the statements being misleading. CocaCola claimed that the name 'vitaminwater' would not mislead consumers and that if there was any doubt, once anyone actually tasted it, it would become obvious that the drink was packed with sugar.
That didn't work. The case is going to trial, and Coca-Cola will have to come up with a niftier argument than "oh come on, everyone knows our drinks have more sugar than a cane plantation". We reckon they'll lose, and they'd lose here too if anyone could be bothered having a go.
We do not disclaim anything about this article. We're quite proud of it really.
Specific Questions relating to this article should be addressed directly to the author.
http://mondaq.com/australia/x/217902/Consumer+Law/Vitamin+water+litigation+misleading+advertising+class+action 
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUALAND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY,MIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS,DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT: BY ORDER OF YOUR WILL AS A CITIZEN OF AUSTRALIA

This NOTICE of NON-CONSENT is pursuant to adding S6 Poison, Industrial Fertiliser Waste or Aluminium Waste, Fluoride, which may contain Arsenic, Mercury, Barium, Lead, Beryllium, Polonium and other, to my househols water supply.
As an Australian Citizen and Water Customer, I DO NOT AUTHORISE, NEITHER DO I CONSENT to my Commonwealth, State or Territory Governments or any other such Body or Water Supplier making this decision regarding my health or water by having added or proposing to add S6 Poison Fertiliser Waste or Aluminium Waste, Fluoride Toxic Chemicals, which may contain Arsenic, Mercury, Barium, Lead, Beryllium, Polonium as mass medication, to my Household Water Supply, putting my health and that of my family at risk.

Please click on link below to see full Notice of Non Consent.
Please …
  • Print a Copy…
  • Address and sign,
  • Make two copies.
  • Send the original to Councillor or Member of Parliament or any other such body by Registered Mail …
  • Include a personal note if you wish.
  • Keep a copy for your records and
  • Forward a copy to us, to show Standing as well as to Subpoena that Particular Member to court in the case of them not having responded to the sender in supporting the removal of fluoridation.
The Notice of Non-Consent literally puts the receiver on notice of accountability. They have been given fluoride-alerts website to become educated and informed as to the scientific evidence against water fluoridation, from that point, they are either in support of Poisoning the People or Not.
Include a personal letter with your Notice. eg. (Re Payment Not Required For Substandard  Goods ie. Toxic Water Quality. Print and include copies of; S6 POISONS  and Health Danger.) 
 Click here to Open -   NOTICE OF NON CONSENT
 NOTE: MOUNT GAMBIER RESIDENTS – Letters of Non-Consent to be lodged by Friday 10 December 2010. Details of what to do can be read in the Guide below.
 
Download your Letter of Non-Consent HERE
Download the Help Guide HERE


Contact Details for Members of Parliament

 Australian Senators

Australian Federal Members of Parliament

Australian State & Territory Parliaments

Australian Local Government Councils

Australian State  Territory & international Health Authorities

Federal Minister

The Hon Nicola Roxon MP – Minister for Health and Ageing

All Australians have an Inherent Right to know the Truth about Sodium Fluoride and the facilities to Vote to end Water Fuoridation Forever.

We have therefore prepared a printable form for the many Australians without computers who would like to Vote to end water fluoridation throughout Australia. The peoples requests to Vote collected on these forms maybe processed as Votes on this site. Please retain all forms to validate Votes. Click to Print. 

See what's happening in your Community!

Get Involved!


Thank you for your Support!
 http://australianfluorideaction.com/your-states/non-consent-letter/
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUALAND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY,MIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS,DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT CAUGHT SPRAYING HIGHLY-DANGEROUS, ILLEGAL CHEMICALS ON FRAGILE WETLANDS

Originally published February 11 2013 by Jonathan Benson, staff writer

(NaturalNews) Australia is often reputed as having one of the most effective regulatory systems in the world for ensuring the safe use of chemicals. But it recently came to our attention that a regional government body in the state of Queensland has decided to develop its own endocrine-disrupting herbicide solution, which it is now spraying across large swaths of the area's coastal region to target an invasive weed species, that is also poisoning plants, animals and potentially even humans.

The government body is known as the Sunshine Coast Regional Council (SCRC), and the chemical product in question is known as "Gloricide." According to an insider tip, local officials from SCRC developed the solution several years ago without consulting an official chemical engineer, and without compiling a valid Material Data Safety Sheet (MDSS) in accordance with federal laws. The council also failed to gain a permit for the solution's use, which technically makes it illegal.

Gloricide reportedly contains a dangerous mixture of both metsulfuron methyl, a highly-toxic herbicide, and 2,4-D, a major toxic component of "Agent Orange" that the Dow Chemical Company is currently trying to deregulate for use on genetically-modified (GM) corn (http://www.naturalnews.com). Together, these two chemicals are supposed to target an invasive weed species known as gloriosa lily, but they also mimic estrogen and have the capacity to disrupt hormone balance in humans.

Gloricide has never been properly safety tested, it turns out, and many say it does not even work at eliminating the gloriosa lily, an estimate that happens to be backed by science. And yet, at the same time, Gloricide is needlessly putting numerous desired plant and animal species at risk, including endangered species like the chemical-sensitive acid frog, which resides all along Australia's Sunshine Coast.

"Gloricide is very dangerous to the health of all animals, especially frogs that absorb the chemical through their skin," explains a petition trying to ban the use of the unapproved chemical. "The council has created this toxic chemical cocktail without testing it and is using it without care or caution. We are breathing in this toxic chemical when we go to the park and swimming in it when it leaches out through the dunes into the ocean."

Former environmental director fired for refusing to poison Australia's wetlands

Back in 2011, the director of an environmental company contracted by SCRC to apply Gloricide was fired for refusing to spray it throughout Australia's sensitive dune network. Adam Presnell, former director of ATP Environmental, told the media at the time that Gloricide was being used "widely and indiscriminately," and that the chemical solution creates a "massively high risk to life and the environment."

"There is a highly risky culture emerging in council and in the bush regeneration industry, and is starting to closely resemble chemical cowboys -- kill it with chemicals any way you can, ask questions later," explained Presnell to reporters, noting that the chemicals used in Gloricide are especially toxic to aquatic animals.

As far as we can tell, Gloricide is still being used in the Sunshine Coast without approval, and the national government of Australia is doing little, if anything, to stop it. Various state and federal government bodies claim that the issue is outside their jurisdiction, which means SCRC is free to continue haphazardly using the toxic chemical blend without penalty.

Sources for this article include:

http://www.sunshinecoastdaily.com.au

http://allevents.in

http://www.naturalnews.com/039042_Australia_chemical_spraying_wetlands.html 
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUALAND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY,MIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS,DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

EXCLUSIVE: DOW SEEKING DEREGULATION OF GE CORN RESISTANT TO 2,4-D, A MAJOR COMPONENT OF AGENT ORANGE

Monday, December 26, 2011 by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger Editor of NaturalNews.com

(NaturalNews) This is an exclusive breaking news story from NaturalNews, please cite this article as the source. It was received as a tip from a concerned health advocate who found it in the federal register, then forwarded it to an industry advocacy group which then forwarded it to us: Dow AgroScience, LLC, is petitioning the U.S. government to deregulate a genetically engineered variety of corn that is resistant to 2,4-D, an extremely toxic pesticide that was 50% of the recipe to making Agent Orange (used in the Vietnam War as a weapon of mass destruction).

This is all admitted right out in the open in the federal register text:
http://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2011/12/27/2011-33009/dow-agr...

"We are advising the public that the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service has received a petition from Dow AgroScience LLC seeking a determination of nonregulated status of corn designated as DAS-40278-9, which has been genetically engineered for increased resistance to broadleaf herbicides in the phenoxy auxin group (such as the herbicide 2,4-D) and resistance to grass herbicides in the aryloxyphenoxypropionate acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitor group (such as quizalofop herbicides)."

The chemical pesticide group 2,4-D can cause acute toxicity and was a major component (roughly 50%) of Agent Orange, says Cornell University:
http://pmep.cce.cornell.edu/profiles/extoxnet/24d-captan/24d-ext.html

Rats fed 2,4-D produced "fetuses with abdominal cavity bleeding and increased mortality," says the Cornell link above, which also states that 2,4-D may cause infertility, birth defects, organ toxicity and neurological effects.

Previously used as a weapon in the Vietnam War, 2,4-D may now be dropped en masse on U.S. crop fields

What's most astonishing about this petition request is that if it is approved, the U.S. would then become an "agricultural war zone" where genetically engineered corn is "carpet bombed" with 2,4-D chemicals. Being resistant to such chemicals, the GE corn may then uptake those chemicals into its own structures and grain kernels, thereby creating corn laced with 2,4-D that would be unleashed when you eat your corn-based breakfast cereals or corn tortillas.

Corn is in practically everything you buy at the grocery store, one way or another. Watch the document King Corn to learn more: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1112115/

Corn is also one of the main feed sources for factory farmed cows, which are especially efficient at concentrating toxins into their fat tissues, to be unleashed when digested by humans.

If this petition is approved by the federal government -- which has long conspired with GMO companies such as Dow, Dupont and Monsanto -- it would result in the unleashing of tens of millions of gallons of toxic pesticide chemicals annually onto America's agricultural landscape (not to mention runoff into rivers, streams, lakes and oceans).

Urgent Action Item: Comment on this Dow petition

The U.S. government claims to be accepting public comments on this petition request. We have no way of knowing whether all such comments are merely chucked into the "round file" or whether they are actually considered, but if you want to submit comments about this petition, YOU CAN'T do it online anyway!

The government's online comment submit system doesn't recognize this document -- at least it didn't at the time this story went to press. Try the following link yourself to see if it works:
http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2010-0103-0001

So your only remaining option is to submit comments by mail:
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to Docket No. APHIS-2010-0103, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238.

From the Federal Register website:
Supporting documents and any comments we receive on this docket may be viewed at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2010-0103 or in our reading room, which is located in room 1141 of the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you, please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.

Share this NaturalNews story! Let people know that America's corn fields are about to be treated with the same chemical weapons our nation once dropped on Vietnam.

What else you can do

Get involved with the Cornucopia Institute. They are working every day to fight exactly this kind of thing (and to protect America's farmers). Join their email list and please consider making a year-end donation to them, as they're doing fantastic work:
www.Cornucopia.org

Subscribe to their free email newsletter (highly recommended) at:
http://www.cornucopia.org/subsrcribe-to-the-cornucopia-institute-news...

Also, check out Jeffrey Smith and the Institute for Responsible Technology, which is fighting against genetically engineered foods and crops:
www.ResponsibleTechnology.org

Additional reference:
Agent Orange was made from roughly a 50/50 mixture of:
• 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)
• 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T)

Documented side effects of Agent Orange include:
• Skin irritation and skin diseases, such as chloracne
• Neurological disorders
• Nerve disorders, including peripheral neuropathy
• Miscarriages in women
• Type 2 diabetes
• Birth defects, physical deformities, spina bifida
• Cancers: multiple myeloma, respiratory system cancers, Hodgkin's disease, prostate cancer, leukemia

Source: http://science.howstuffworks.com/agent-orange3.htm

Read more:
http://www.agentorangecanada.com/killme.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2,4-d
http://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2011/12/27/2011-33009/dow-agr...
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUALAND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY,MIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS,DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com

Sunday, February 3, 2013

WESTERN AUSTRALIA RALLY AGAINST FLUORIDE FEBRUARY 2013

Written by Fluoride Free WA
Did you know that after the forthcoming State Election we have our best opportunity in more than a generation to bring about an end to unethical and immoral practice of water fluoridation here in WA?

If you agree:
1/ Like, share & invite your friends to follow our campaign
2/ Print off the attached flyer for next Sunday's talk, and give to your friends, put up on notice boards & leave in café's
3/ Come along to our big event & talk, next Sunday, 10th February, 2pm at The State Library of WA

Together we can achieve a Fluoride Free WA

ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUALAND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY,MIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO KEEP YOUR NEWS,DIVERSE,AND FREE OF CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST, PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com