After
thoroughly examining both sides of the vaccination debate, Dr.
Humphries unequivocally stands by the conviction that vaccines are an
insult to life and health.
The history of vaccination is more complicated than most people
understand. The antivaccinationist movement is hundreds of years old.
It heated up in the 1800′s, when parents in the UK became fed up with
watching their completely healthy infants and children die shortly after
the smallpox vaccinations. Parents and doctors risked losing their
homes, their furniture and their livelihoods in order to beat back the
deadly, disease-provoking smallpox vaccines. The vaccines were made from
pus scraped off of diseased cows’ belly sores, contaminated with all
sorts of disease matter. The smallpox vaccine history is not what you
think it is, if you think vaccines wiped out smallpox. See
this chapter for more information on the smallpox history.
Doctors and those administering vaccines are supposed to get
“informed consent” before vaccinating. This is not possible because the
research has not been done to show that vaccines are safe beyond a few
days or weeks. Most vaccine studies do not use real placebos either,
but use another vaccine as the control placebo. See this
this article
as an example of how false placebos are regularly used. Needless to
say, giving untested(no vaccine has undergone carcinogenicity testing
for example, if you are wondering), often contaminated and with
unproven-effectiveness vaccines is a “medical experiment” and violates
the core principles of the Nuremberg – (informed and unambiguous
consent)Code. Forcing people to take vaccines, whether by a proclaimed
“emergency,” by a “public health” order from the WHO, or by threat of
loss of rights over one’s children or of imprisonment, or by threat of
being abandoned by the medical professionals supposedly providing care,
removes consent, as does giving vaccines to those unable by age or
mental status to legally consent. “Informed,” as well, is devoid of all
meaning when people are tricked into taking vaccines by the use of false
or frightening “information.”
I have found in my own practice, my own career and everywhere else,
that the more one studies vaccination in-depth, the less they are
inclined to vaccinate and the more comfortable they are not
vaccinating. Parents must learn the ways to take care of their children
when they get the common childhood illnesses. If they do, and allow
their children to recover naturally, in most cases, the child will have
long-term immunity. Vaccination has robbed teenagers and adults of the
opportunity to get re-exposed and continue with natural immunity. As a
result, mothers’ breast milk is devoid of the necessary antibodies they
need to protect their newborns – even if they are vaccinated. This is
but one of the many consequences we face as a result of vaccination for
measles and the other childhood illnesses such as rubella.
Medical schools do not educate doctors about the contents, dangers,
effectiveness or necessity of vaccines. Medical doctors are fearful of
the natural childhood illnesses because they don’t have any idea how to
safely assist patients through them; and worse yet their limited
treatment options often cause the diseases to be worse than they have to
be.
Natural
News interview with Suzanne Humphries, MD about vaccines. Natural News
is the world’s largest natural health and wellness news organization.
If you would like to gain a better understanding of vaccination and
what immunologists do not know, please read this short but very
informative book, written by a PhD immunologist who bravely told the
vaccine story from a well-educated standpoint.
Vaccine Illusion
Please also read this short article from Standford Medicine, where the limitations of immunology are plainly spelled out
here.
The public is repeatedly deceived in order to maintain participation
in vaccination. All sorts of tactics are used. One of the most popular,
is to say that everyone should get vaccinated in order to protect the
unvaccinated. This is commonly known as “herd immunity.”
HERE is an article I wrote on the subject.
The business of vaccination is highly profitable, and always has
been. In addition to the billions of dollars made by drug companies
every year on vaccines, hospitals, doctors, and pharmaceutical companies
prosper from the collateral damage of the barbaric and unscientific
practice of vaccination.
Doctors parrot the advice, “We have to vaccinate them while they are
young so the ‘take rate’ is high.” A case-in-point is an article for
which I was interviewed:
Bangor Metro: “A Shot to The Heart”
In this article, one of Maine’s supposed top experts is giving
unscientific advice. We just learned from the PhD immunologist the above
audio clip that the first 3 series of shots “don’t work.” But Maine’s
vaccine expert says:
“Concerns about how much a young child’s immune system
can handle at one time have prompted some parents to stagger
vaccinations. But Fanburg points out that there is no medical data to
support the practice, adding that it’s actually more beneficial to
vaccinate infants, rather than wait until they are older. “Children have
a better ‘take’ of vaccines in their first two years of life,” he says.
“There is a higher rate of immunogenicity, which is the child’s ability
to produce antibodies to the vaccine antigen.”
This statement is absolute nonsense. This man lacks understanding as
to how an infant’s immune system develops and why. If he understood,
he would be unable to utter such a statement. A baby’s immune system
produces only very small amounts of IL-1B and TNFa. There was a time
when experts thought that this was simply a DEFECT in all newborn
humans. In 2004, Chelvarajan suggested that if vaccine pushers added
various immune system kickers into vaccines, this would solve the
problem and fix these perfectly normal children’s horribly deviant
immune systems. All vaccines for Strep Pneumo, Hib and Meningococcal
diseases have potent “adjuvants” – like irritating oils and aluminum –
for this purpose, because without them, the baby’s immune system acts
from the blue-print, sits there and does nothing – just as it’s supposed
to do…”defectively” per the eyes of science. How very arrogant, don’t
you think?
However, by
2007, Chelvarajan was seeing things differently, and stated in the last paragraph, that whereas in the past, they had considered this a
“defect”, they now considered it:
“
an important developmental program” saying,
“This
anti-inflammatory phenotype may be beneficial to the neonate at a time
when tissue growth and remodelling events are taking place at a rapid
pace… thus the inability of the neonate to respond to infection with
encapsulated bacteria may be the risk the organism takes for successful
development.”
In order to adjust to the world appropriately, not only is the
“anti-inflammatory phenotype” critical to an infant, but breast milk is
also essential to protect the baby from toxin-mediated and other
diseases while the immune system develops appropriately- in it’s own due
time, according to the master plan of the creator. That’s it! The
non-inflammatory position of the immune system is seriously altered by
vaccines which shift the T cells in a direction that will react
abnormally in the future, leading to all sorts of the childhood diseases
many people think are normal. But guess what…tubes inserted past the
eardrums of a child are not a right of passage, inhalers should not be
part of a lunchbox, epipens should not be necessary, type I diabetes in
children is mostly avoidable. Even antibiotics are completely
avoidable. In fact many non-vaccinating parents raise their children
never needing drugs at all. The sad part is that the public has been
conditioned to accept such a skewed and backwards medical system, and
that they think it is the soundest option available to them. Nothing
could be farther from the truth.
The healthiest and most disease-free infants, children, adults and elderly people are the unvaccinated.
If it is important for successful development of a baby to allow the
RISK of infection by NOT allowing two key parts of the primary infection
defence to “fire”, what’s the OTHER risk you might take, if you
force
an immune system to do something it’s not supposed to do…by causing
repeated, chronic inflammation at the end of a vaccine needle?
Peripheral inflammation and vaccine adjuvants, can; cause brain
inflammation, create allergies, autoimmunity – constant inflammation all
around the body – not just at the site of the injection… and… cause
mitochondria to stop working properly.
So, you might now be thinking…if a baby’s default position to NOT
respond to toxin-mediated bacterial diseases, what chance does a baby
have to survive in this world? If you would like to learn more about
this, read this 3 part blog series by Hilary Butler.
Infant immune system development.
While vaccine-enthused doctors may pull
“peer reviewed literature” to supposedly prove their point, a closer
look at their own literature invariably proves otherwise – as does a
look at the sick population of vaccinated children they supposedly care
for. Yet these types of ridiculous myths are continuously propagated by
parroting doctors who know almost nothing about vaccination, except
what vaccines are due at what age, and who have never had the pleasure
of caring for an unvaccinated child to see the enormous difference in
health overall.
The unfounded fear over the illnesses supposedly prevented by
vaccination is based on a history of unscientific theory and policy
driven by profit, not health. We must learn how to care for the common,
immune building illnesses and not fall prey to the 200 year farce that
injecting disease matter, animal matter, chemicals, metals and a host of
other toxic elements could possibly promote health. History
demonstrates this practice to be an utter failure. Do not be afraid of
measles, because well nourished children who get adequate vitamin A fare
just fine with measles. Do not be afraid of whooping cough, because
parents all over the world have been having a very easy time with
whooping cough using high doses of vitamin C and homeopathy – but you
will not read about them in “peer reviewed literature” and your doctor
doesn’t know about them, because only sick children – the ones they see
and often create – get counted in the morbidity statistics. But the
healthy children who uneventfully pass illnesses through them never
touch the medical system and thus are not counted. The morbidity of
most childhood diseases comes from just a few things; infant formula,
cow’s milk, common medical drugs, malnutrition, and vaccines. All of
these things are completely avoidable in the USA and many other
countries and that is WHY we see so many healthy unvaccinated children
when we look.
See how mortality for the common illnesses had declined significantly long before the vaccines were created.
There a few common misperceptions about NOT vaccinating:
- You are putting other people at risk by not vaccinating. At risk
for what? Chicken pox? Ask your grandmother if she knew anyone who died
from measles. Different diseases have different degrees of severity in
different age groups. But the bottom line is that the misperception
that “if you don’t vaccinate you place others at risk” is based on an
assumption that vaccinated people do not get the disease they were
vaccinated for. Did you know that a controlled study
in school age children showed that of all the whooping cough that was
diagnosed, over 86% of the children were fully vaccinated and up to date
for the whooping cough vaccine? There are similar studies showing that
mumps and measles breakouts predominately effect the vaccinated. People
who are vaccinated have had their immune systems altered in a manner
that often leads to susceptibility to other infectious diseases, and
leaves them vulnerable to the disease they were vaccinated for due to a
phenomenon called “original antigenic sin” whereby the antigen injected
programs the body to react in a manner that is incomplete and inferior
to the natural response to infection which is comprehensive and
longer-lasting. Many vaccine enthusiasts like to invoke the term “herd
immunity” to make the argument that the unvaccianted pose a risk to the
vaccinated. But the concept of herd immunity has no relevance to the
vaccinated as it was coined in reference to natural immunity in
populations and what level the least epidemics occurred. There is no
evidence whatsoever that having an 85% or 95% vaccination rate protects
from outbreaks. This theory has been disproven time and again in highly
vaccinated populations.
- The unvaccinated spread disease. Actually it is the opposite. Live
vaccines are known to spread to close contacts. Here is one recent
example.
Live vaccines can spread disease.
We also know that in pertussis (whooping cough) those who are
vaccinated are more likely, due to original antigenic sin, to be
carriers of the bacteria longer than the unvaccinated, even when
asymptomatic.
Full text article available here.
By 2004, James Cherry pointed out that adults, revaccinated against
pertussis, don’t develop any antibacterial activity whatsoever. He went
on to explain why. The current vaccines contains a few antigens, which
create “original antigenic sin”, whereby the immune response to the
vaccine is abnormal. That first learned response then becomes the
default position the immune system takes, on future booster shots. So in
the case of the whooping cough vaccines there are key protein virulence
factors which have not been included in the vaccines including ACT,
TCF, TCT, as well as BrkA and DNT. Because the first three are not
included, the default immune response, does not prevent colonisation,
and furthermore, Cherry stated that the “original antigenic sin” results
in the vaccinated being unable to clear the bacteria from their lungs.
The unvaccinated have immunity to all the front line virulence factors
and very quickly clear the bacteria on re-exposure.
Mothers who have been vaccinated, may develop surrogate markers, but
these do not guarantee efficient immune responses after exposure to the
natural disease, because their first “learned response” was incorrect.
Furthermore, they are still not sure “what” the surrogate marker
actually is for pertussis.
There is similar information on measles, the other disease that has
recently hit the media as a supposed danger to the population due to the
unvaccinated. But this information is not accurate, nor is measles a
dangerous disease in people who have sufficient vitamin A.
Damien
pointed out that the vaccinated are 5-8 times more susceptible to
asymptomatic infection than the unvaccinated. How then, are the
unvaccinated solely responsible for the recent outbreaks in measles?
Many vaccines are said to be “attenuated” or modified live that
supposedly do not infect, but over the decades we have seen how these
attenuated viruses mutate once they are in a human and spread worse
disease than what is being vaccinated for. The oral polio vaccines in
Nigeria are a case in point. But this can happen with any attenuated
viral vaccine. The original Salk polio vaccines were supposed to be
killed vaccines and yet they infected thousands of people, the household
contacts and the community, killing and paralyzing over 200 people.
This figure is thought to be a gross underestimation of the damage
done. It is not uncommon to see a child recently vaccinated for chicken
pox develop shingles or chicken pox. We see this often enough. Also
I’ve seen shingles vaccine cause shingles in an elderly woman days after
the vaccine was given. These are highly contagious diseases, being
spread because of the vaccine. Here are things to consider when you hear
of an outbreak of an infectious disease: how many of the affected were
fully vaccinated and how many people died. When these things are
reported the results do not flatter the vaccines.
- The terrible diseases that once plagued humanity will return if we
do not keep up the vaccines. We can see from the above graph that the
mortality of these diseases was drastically declining prior to
vaccination. But in addition, you might want to know the more rational
explanation for deadly disease decline in modern times. It’s not
vaccination. See the link below.
What is the evidence for a causal link between hygiene and infections?
Here is more information on vaccination myths:
Vaccine Myths.
All the reduction even for TB, was achieved BEFORE any vaccines of
any sort were offered, and most of the reductions for all diseases, were
achieved before antibiotics became commercially available in about 1950
as well. So what did that? It wasn’t vaccines.
BTW, there never was a vaccine for scarlet fever. Scarlet fever and
it’s resulting complication, rheumatic fever – has clearly been shown in
the medical literature, to be nutritionally driven. This is why if you
do find someone who says they had scarlet fever, it is primarily in
more impoverished and less educated groups throughout history. Some well
educated people in stable social environments, without much money, will
be on the scale of low susceptibility because it is really the
nutrition and well being that count. It just so happens that low
education, homelessness and low money often co-exist. All of us carry
Strep A regularly, but the well-fed amongst us don’t get scarlet fever,
let alone it’s complication, rheumatic fever. The reason it’s a
significant problem in the less educated, less nourished groups where
poverty is rampant, is because poor nutrition, historically correlated
with higher rheumatic fever. This point is well studied enough to lay
aside any concern over whether or not correlation implies causation. In
the case of infectious diseases, the low nutrition is not a cause per
se, but it is a major preventive factor, that has led to enormous
declines of morbidity and mortality with infectious diseases of all
kinds, not just strep A and rheumatic fever, but also measles.
You may be aware of Dr. Andrew Wakefield, the doctor who was
supposedly discredited after writing about Autism and vaccines. Before
you believe what you’ve heard on mainstream TV and media, please view
this
VIDEO and be aware that Dr.
Walker-Smith and Dr. Wakefield were exonerated of the false claims made
by Brian Deere, the journalist credited for defaming Dr. Wakefield.
Dr Wakefield and Dr Walker-Smith exonerated.
See this video
here where Dr Wakefield so rationally and eloquently outlines the real issues involved in his attacks.
If you made it to the end of this, and would like to discuss
vaccination further, Dr Humphries is willing to do that on the phone or
in person. Please schedule an appointment, where your questions can be
answered, and you can be directed to the resources that best serve your
individual needs.
http://drsuzanne.net/dr-suzanne-humphries-vaccines-vaccination/
ETHICAL DONATORS AND COMMUNITY
MEMBERS REQUIRED, TO FILL THIS SPACE WITH YOUR POLITICAL SLOGANS, ADVERTISING
OFFERS, WEBSITE DETAILS, CHARITY REQUESTS, LECTURE OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL
WORKSHOPS, SPIRITUALAND/OR HEALTH ENLIGHTENMENT
COURSES.
AS AN IMPORTANT MEMBER
OF THE GLOBAL INDEPENDENT MEDIA COMMUNITY,MIKIVERSE HEALTH HONOURABLY REQUESTS YOUR HELP TO
KEEP YOUR NEWS,DIVERSE,AND FREE OF
CORPORATE, GOVERNMENT SPIN AND CONTROL. FOR MORE INFO ON HOW YOU MAY ASSIST,
PLEASE CONTACT: themikiverse@gmail.com
Would
you believe me if I told you that farts (medically known as flatulence)
can actually be an indicator of poor health? Some farts are actually
more than simply an embarrassment at the dinner table or a first date.
Farts can actually be an indicator that something is seriously wrong in
your digestion leading to a variety of health issues.
Everyone farts, this much is true. On average, most humans fart between 10 and 20 times a day, but sometimes much more!