Published October 19, 2013 By: Roger Landry (TLB) The loss of our basic right to determine our own health care
including Forced Vaccinations is coming and in many cases the precursors
already exist. When We The People no longer have the right to decide
what goes into our bodies and are forced to acquiesce to government
mandates on such issues as Vaccinations then tyranny is no longer a
possibility … it is a fact! This article will discuss this point and the reasons so many of us
choose not to vaccinate and will stand by that decision. Only the use of
tyrannical force will overcome that objection.
Study after study is proving that vaccines are ineffective, may cause
the very disease they are purported to prevent and in some cases may
cause more harm to us than the actual disease. Peer Reviewed studies now
link vaccines and psychotropic drugs to such physical and mental
diseases as Cancer, SIDS, Dementia, Autism, ADHD, Behavioral Disorders
and a host of other maladies we as a nation suffer on a massive scale,
some of which we as a nation lead the world in. Is
it just coincidence that the rise in these diseases coincides almost
perfectly with the massive drive to vaccinate the American public and
put a huge portion of this population on psychotropic drugs? Is it just a
coincidence that we are the most vaccinated and drugged nation on this
planet? When does coincidence become fact? Below you will find an abundance of information contained in excerpts
from an article called “Boycott The American Academy Of Pediatrics”
first published about two years ago. Some of the information and active
links has been updated to function and to reflect current conditions.
The knowledge and information contained is invaluable for those of us
facing persecution and indeed legal ramifications for our steadfast and
scientifically fact based beliefs! Additional information on the
Nuremberg Code is also included below as well as a video on this subject
… _________________________________________________________ Excerpts from: “Boycott The American Academy Of Pediatrics” In 2000, “At an annual meeting at the Association of American
Physicians and Surgeons, a resolution called for an end to all
government mandated vaccinations. The resolution passed without a single
dissenting vote.” The resolution read, “Mass vaccination is equivalent
to human experimentation and subject to the Nuremberg Code.” (Francis). In 2007, Gov. Perry of Texas, lied and told families that he had the power to force children to take vaccines.
In California, AB 499 has become law (Governor Brown Signed AB 499
into Law on August 27, 2013). This bill takes away parental informed
consent for a dangerous & potentially deadly vaccine. http://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Home.aspx SANE Vax Inc. discovers potential bio-hazard contaminant in MERCK’s Gardisil HPV-4 Vaccine http://sanevax.org/sane-vax-inc-discovers-potential-bio-hazard-contaminant-in-mercks-gardasil-hpv-4-vaccine/ Judicial Watch investigated side effects of HPV Vaccine and
discovered at least 3589 adverse reactions including 213 cases of
permanent disability and 16 deaths. Is HPV Vaccine Safe? Please watch
this clip that includes a report from Cheryl Atkinson of CBS.
If That is not enough to convince you, see the many articles appropriate to this subject here: http://www.judicialwatch.org/?s=HPV+Vaccine Please take a moment to reflect on this quote, “Education should aim
at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they
shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or
acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. . . .
Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age,
to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the
authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers
that be will become psychologically impossible.” Bertrand Russell The
Impact of Science on Society, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1953, p. 50. If This concerns you at all please check out http://truthaboutgardasil.org/ If you are still reading this and care about the future and freedom of humanity please watch this.
Here is a Hollywood Propaganda piece,” Contagion,” “No One is Immune to Fear” Please forward this to your friends and
family, especially to those that have children and those that work in
the medical field. I urge everyone to call their state and federal
legislators and demand a stop to mandates & demand more freedom not
less. “Perfect freedom is as necessary to the health and vigor of
commerce as it is to the health and vigor of citizenship.” Patrick Henry
Baby DNA is being confiscated across the country without parents
consent. http://www.cchfreedom.org/cchf.php/121 More & more children are being given stimulants, anti-depressants
and ant-psychotics. In the last 20 or so years there has been an
increase in mass murder and school shootings. The pharmaceutical
industry has known about the connection to the 2D6 Gene. http://www.dovepress.com/articles.php?article_id=7993 10 recent massacres were committed by those under the influence of psychiatric drugs resulting in 54 dead and 105 wounded. http://www.cchrint.org/tag/school-shootings/ All the while Bush planned on screening the entire population for mental illness. starting with, “Teen Screen.” http://www.antidepressantsfacts.com/2004-06-19-Bush-screen-US-mental-illness.htm Meanwhile: Gene specific drugs are being developed. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15513304. For, “the treatment of a large number of metabolic and infectious
diseases including but not limited to cancer, macular degeneration,
diabetic retinopathy, Alzheimer’s and other neural disorders, autoimmune
diseases, and all viral infections including AIDS (acquired immune
deficiency syndrome), hepatitis and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).”
Please help in the call protest the American Academy of Pediatrics and
any and all physicians that attempt to promote the use of HPV Vaccine or
any other dangerous vaccine, weather you are pro-education, pro vaccine
choice or anti-vaccine, or wherever you stand. “We must all hang
together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.” Ben Franklin.
Stand Up For Liberty! Peace, Love & Liberty Will Prevail. (Tyranny) Violation Of The Nuremberg Code
K TLB: Parting Shot – Have we learned nothing from our experience with
the eugenics programs of Nazi Germany … or has our government learned
too much … TLB would like to voice our deep appreciation to: www.healthcaretyranny.com for
the information gleaned from their article “Boycott The American
Academy Of Pediatrics” and highly recommends you visit their site for
more great health/health tyranny information.
The following
are the most effective actions to Take Back Your Power. Hundreds of
thousands of citizens across the United States, Canada, Australia and
United Kingdom have realized that they have power over their utility
companies and governments. The following action steps are based on their
experience.
A) Knowledge is Power
Your utility company is
counting on you to be complacent. However, as Take Back Your Power has
shown, the stakes are too high. Along with the movie, the information on
this website and our partnering organizations provide you with what you
need to protect yourself, your family and your community. Here you will
find what you need to know about the health, safety, privacy and legal
rights related to the smart meter programs being deployed throughout the
world.
Sign up to our Email Updates, available at the top of the Take Back Your Power website, www.takebackyourpower.net. As things unfold, it will be important to stay up-to-date with developments.
Reach out to other organizations who are
working to stop smart meters. There are approximately 150 anti-smart
meter organizations around the world (that we know of) and the number
continues to grow! This is humanity’s immune system waking up to fight a
toxic program.
Note that your local smart meter
organization may have more current information regarding effective
strategies and specific laws and legal actions in your region. Please
check with them, but also use the following as a guide.
The Worldwide Directory will help you find an organization near you. If there is not one in your area, start one! We will help you.
C) Identify Your Meter
Before you move on, determine if you
have a smart meter by comparing your electrical meter to typical smart
meters. Also determine if your utility has a smart meter “opt-out”
program. This will help you determine which stage below applies to you.
This webpage will help you with this.
D) Take Action
The following steps are for the various
scenarios that you may encounter. Some communities do not have a smart
meter program yet. Others are many years into their smart meter program
and have already made significant progress to stop smart meters. The
stages of smart meter deployment below will walk you through the most
important action steps related to your situation.
Stage #1:Your utility has not yet installed smart meters in your community
Protect your analog meter. Lock up your electrical meter and place a
“No Trespassing” sign with your signature on it. Also place a “No Smart
Meter” sign next to the analog meter and take a picture/video as
evidence.
Send official notice
to your utility. Let them know that you do not agree to a smart meter
installation. Send the letter certified mail with a return receipt. Here
is a sample letter.
Begin raising awareness about the dangers of smart meters before
your utility decides to install them in your community. Show this movie
to friends and at community events. Educate your community leaders. Pass out flyers.
If enough people in your community are aware of the dangers, your
utility will think twice about moving forward with so much public
resistance. Smart meter programs have already been shown not to save any
money. Combine this with public resistance and smart utility companies
will not move forward with such an unwise program.
Stage #2: Your utility has already installed a smart meter on your home and in your community and does not offer an “opt-out” option
Send your utility official notice that they must remove the smart
meter within 48 hours. An excellent letter that you can send to your
utility can be found at FreedomTaker.com.
You can also buy an analog meter from this site or elsewhere on the
internet. In the package that you send certified mail to your utility,
you may also want to include a cover letter and a letter from your
medical doctor if you are experiencing health effects or have a medical
condition that can be exacerbated by wireless smart meters. Some people
have also included a letter from their attorney stating that the smart
meter program is a direct assault on their right to privacy guaranteed
under the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution.
If your utility does not respond in a timely fashion, then you may
want to hire a certified electrician to install the analog meter for
you. Be sure to record the readings from the smart meter before your
certified electrician un-installs the meter so that your utility cannot
say that you are stealing electricity (Video and photos are good for
this process). Your utility may try to harass and bully you by turning
off your electricity. However, they are not on sound legal footing and they know it. It is up to you to demand your rights to safety and privacy.
If your utility turns off your electricity or forcefully re-installs
a smart meter, then reach out to your local media. Take a video your
utility’s actions. The last thing your utility wants is press on this
issue – it will wake up more people. Send your footage to TakeBackYourPower.net, StopSmartMeters.org and the EMFSafetyNetwork.org. You are not alone. We will help publicize the actions of your utility and smart meter companies.
Do not accept a non-transmitting digital meter. Any digital meter
uses a switching-mode power supply, which as we learned in the film,
produces “dirty” electricity on the wiring of your entire home. The only
safe option for your family is an analog meter. If your utility will
not provide one, you can purchase one from FreedomTaker.com or elsewhere on the web. There are plenty of analog electrical meter suppliers.
Help your neighbors do the same thing. Share what you have learned.
If only you opt-out, then you will still be exposed to the radiation
from your neighbor’s smart meters. Working together will give you power
over the utility company. Continue to work together until your utility
company and local public utility commission abandons their smart meter
program or offers a no-fee opt-out option for everyone in your region.
Stage #3:You have smart meters in your community and your utility offers an opt-out option, but for a fee
Realize that the opt-out option – with a fee – is only a temporary,
false solution. It actually benefits the utility companies because they
look like “good guys” because they are supposedly being helpful. Don’t
believe this. You should opt-out, but you are not legally required to
pay a fee in order to protect your health, safety and privacy. Such a payment is called extortion.
The “opt-out” fee will most likely be overturned by the courts. You may
want to do what thousands of other people are doing and protest the fee
by simply not paying it. If your utility harasses you and threatens to
turn off your electricity, then utilize the actions in Stages #1 and #2
above. Remember, your utility is not on sound legal footing and they know it.
Encourage all of your friends and neighbors to opt-out of the smart
meter program. One woman in California got 150 of her neighbors to
opt-out of smart meters. She created a radiation-free and dirty
electricity-free zone around her long-time home. This meant she was not
forced to move. Once everyone has opted-out, they can protest the
illegal fees by not paying. Encourage your entire community and town to
opt-out together. As enough citizens opt-out, the smart meter programs
may eventually collapse because there will not be enough smart meters
for the wireless mesh network system to work. The utilities know this is
yet another weakness in their programs, which is why they desperately
want to charge an extortionate opt-out fee to discourage people from
opting-out. Don’t let them fool you.
Support the legal and political
efforts that are taking place in your region and across the world. The
smart meter programs will eventually be rolled back as the health,
safety and privacy issues are laid bare in the courts and become obvious
for all to see. This is inevitable as microwave radiation is too
dangerous to have in our homes and communities. Support the efforts in
any way you can. Introduce people with financial resources to this issue
by sharing the movie – they will help everyone turn the tide. This is
currently a David vs. Goliath battle, but the tables can be turned
quickly as more people realize that our very future is at stake.
Remember that you have the power in this situation. The truth
is on your side. A huge mistake has been made by our governments and
corporations. The utility and smart meter industries know this and are
afraid of the public realizing it. We will eventually be successful.
Good luck and keep us informed of your progress. Join our mailing list (at the top of www.takebackyourpower.net) to keep up to date on the latest developments as we all Take Back Our Power!
Thank you to our growing community for providing their valuable insights and experiences toward this Strategy Guide.
- See more at: http://www.takebackyourpower.net/take-action/#sthash.zb9JdFmt.dpuf
Susan Reynolds, 29, has been following a raw food diet for years and says she’s often mistaken for being in her teens.
Twist and Sprout
The fresh-faced entrepreneur hasn't eaten a cooked meal in seven years
Inspired
by a six-month trip to India at 21 years old, Susan Reynolds started
yoga and discovered the raw food diet, leading to the healthy path she's
on today. Prior to this trip, Reynolds' enjoyed eating Chinese take away and McDonalds, plus boozy vodka-fuelled binges on the town. Today,
Reynolds, now 29, eats nothing but uncooked vegetables, fruit, seeds
and nuts, a diet which she claims is the secret to her fresh-faced looks
and teenage compliments. These days Reynolds' drink of choice is green juice.
“I focus on a very high liquid diet with lots of green juice,
smoothies, soups and "elixirs". I try to get as much leaf green veggies
in to my diet as possible. I eat fruits for energy and sparingly eat
fats from nuts, seeds and coconut," she told the Daily Mail. The healthy switch has been a positive move for Reynolds, who says she has no desire to eat cooked meals or junk food as her raw food diet has made her "emotionally balanced". "I feel if you sort out the emotional attachment to cooked food you don't crave it any more," she says. Other
benefits Reynolds reaps from her diet is “clarity, positivity, health,
energy, radiance and the ability to make choices. Other things people
have commented on include smelling good, great skin and youthfulness.” Reynolds
has also turned her healthy food passion into a business, Twist and
Sprout, which seeks to educate people about creating healthier
lifestyles with the raw food diet. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2457571/Raw-food-diet-entrepreneur-Susan-Reynolds-mistaken-teenager.html#ixzz2hf82gPUO
A snapshot of what Susan eats in a day:5am: Wake up, drink 750ml lemon water 6.30am to 8.30am: Yoga practice. 10am: A litre of green juice made from blending a whole lettuce, a bag of spinach and bunch of herbs. 11am to 4pm:
Snacks, including whole fruit (figs, mangoes, berries etc.), raw
chocolate, green juice, and superfoods such as bee pollen and berries.6pm:
Large salad and/or green soups, or another raw dish created from fruit
and vegetables, soaked nuts and seeds depending on what she feels she
needs that day.
By Caroline Young While it may seem like the organic food movement became popular over
the past two decades, it is actually a much older concept. Everyone ate
organic fruits and veggies before World War II, because all crops were
organic. It was after that when many farmers started "conventionally"
growing crops: spraying them with new, synthetic pesticides and
chemicals to reduce weeds, insects and rodents. Now many of us enter the
produce section with some confusion, as we are offered every fruit and
veggie grown in two very different ways. What's the Difference Between Conventional and Organic Foods? Conventional foods differ from organics in several ways, including
the use of chemical versus natural fertilizers (i.e., compost) to feed
soil and plants. Conventional farmers also use synthetic herbicides to
manage weeds, while organic farmers use environmentally generated
plant-killing compounds. Therefore, organic produce has significantly
fewer pesticide residues than conventional produce. The USDA organic regulations
also ban the use of food additives, processing aids, and fortifying
agents found in conventional foods, like artificial sweeteners and
coloring, preservatives and monosodium glutamate. Global organic food sales have skyrocketed from a total of $1 billion
in 1990 to $29 billion by 2011. However, those numbers only represent
about 4.2 percent of all food sold
in the U.S. during this time period. And as more and more people buy
organic foods for their health benefits, these foods often get a bad rap
for higher costs. In the conversation over benefit vs. price, some studies reveal doubt
around organic foods truly having significantly higher nutritional
benefits than conventional foods. Despite the skeptics, there is a
rising agreement in the scientific community that small amounts of
pesticides and other chemicals have negative effects on health. Pregnant
women and mothers should especially be aware because studies show fetuses and young children may be more negatively affected by harmful exposure to low levels of pesticides. 1) Potatoes When deciding which foods to buy organic, potatoes are a must. Most
conventionally-grown have one of the highest pesticide contents among
fruits and veggies. The USDA discovered 81 percent of potatoes tested in 2006 contained pesticides even after being washed and peeled. 2) Beef When animals are conventionally raised, they are fed growth hormones
and medications to fight disease and speed growth, which inevitably end
up in our hamburgers and our bodies. The hormones push cows' estrogen
and testosterone levels unnaturally high. In turn, those hormones can
possibly have strong effects on our natural body processes. The European
Union actually banned all hormones in beef.
On the other hand, organic farmers try to match the natural behavior of
animals and permit access to the outdoors. To reduce diseases, organic
farmers take measures like rotational grazing, clean housing, and
organic balanced diets with no animal by products. 3) Milk To increase the quantity of milk produced, cows
raised conventionally are given rBGH (recombinant bovine growth
hormone), which is banned in the European Union and Canada, among others. While there is no solid scientific evidence rBGH can harm us, it may benefit us to drink milk free of rBGH given the American Cancer Society has determined the potential harm to humans is inconclusive and rBGH can cause adverse health effects in cows. 4) Apples Apple peel is one of this popular tree fruit's healthiest parts, offering phytochemicals that can reduce risk of cancer and heart disease. Unfortunately, the peel is where pesticides accumulate, putting apples at the top of the organic foods priority list. 5) Strawberries Do you wonder why the conventional strawberries sometimes appear a
bit brighter in color than their organic counterparts? It's because some
of them are enhanced with a substance containing the contaminant fungicide captan.
Plus, conventional strawberries with the most pesticides are often the
imported ones because pesticide restrictions are not always the same in
other countries. 6) Kale and Spinach While spinach and kale offer many nutrients with very low calories,
they are often sprayed with more than 20 kinds of pesticides before
being tossed in our salads and cooked in our omelets. A USDA study found 58 pesticide residues are usually contained in spinach. 7) Peaches Peaches, while juicy and delicious, are high on the list of tree
fruits for being the most susceptible to pesticide residue, and usually
contain levels above the legal limits. Contaminants in peaches are fungicides captan and iprodione, which have been linked to cancer. Going Organic Can Help Our Planet Production of conventional foods may cost the planet a whole lot more
than a few extra bucks at the grocery store. Overtime, pesticides and
herbicides used in the harvest of conventional foods contaminate groundwater, promote erosion, and destroy soil structures. Plus, they can threaten the U.S. food supply by contributing to "colony collapse disorder," or the mysterious die-off of pollinating honeybees. Conventional Produce Is Better Than None While it is beneficial to our health and planet to buy organic foods
as much as possible, it can be hard to dole out the extra cash,
especially during slower economic times. If it is just not in the
budget, don't fret. The Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit that
advocating for policies to both individual and global health, created a
list of produce called the "Clean 15,"
which are your safest choices. They have the smallest pesticide load
and the safest conventional foods to consume. Some of the foods include
mushrooms, pineapple, avocado, asparagus, and sweet potatoes. Remember, it is important to keep plenty of fruits and veggies as
part of a balanced diet, and not to sacrifice the benefits of eating
fruits and veggies for the risk of pesticide exposure. Focus on going
organic when it fits into your life, especially focusing on the foods
you eat most often and high-pesticide foods, including BuiltLean's top
seven.
Sep 23 by Zoltan P. Rona MD MSc During nearly 19 years of clinical practice I have had the
opportunity to observe the health effects of drinking different types of
water. Most of you would agree that drinking unfiltered tap water could
be hazardous to your health because of things like:
parasites
chlorine
fluoride
dioxins
Many health fanatics, however, are often surprised to hear me say that drinking distilled water on a regular, daily basis is potentially dangerous.
Paavo Airola wrote about the dangers of distilled water in the 1970′s when it first became a fad with the health food crowd.
Distillation is the process in which water is boiled, evaporated and
the vapour condensed. Distilled water is free of dissolved minerals and,
because of this, has the special property of being able to actively
absorb toxic substances from the body and eliminate them. Studies
validate the benefits of drinking distilled water when one is seeking to
cleanse or detoxify the system for short periods of time (a few weeks
at a time). Fasting using distilled water can be dangerous because of the
rapid loss of electrolytes (sodium, potassium, chloride) and trace
minerals like magnesium, deficiencies of which can cause heart beat
irregularities and high blood pressure. Cooking foods in distilled water
pulls the minerals out of them and lowers their nutrient value. Distilled water is an active absorber and when it comes into contact with air, it absorbs carbon dioxide,making it acidic. The more distilled water a person drinks, the higher the body acidity becomes. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Distilled
water, being essentially mineral-free, is very aggressive, in that it
tends to dissolve substances with which it is in contact. Notably,
carbon dioxide from the air is rapidly absorbed, making the water acidic
and even more aggressive. Many metals are dissolved by distilled
water.”
The most toxic commercial beverages that people consume
(i.e. cola beverages and other soft drinks) are made from distilled
water. Studies have consistently shown that heavy consumers of soft
drinks (with or without sugar) spill huge amounts of calcium, magnesium
and other trace minerals into the urine.
The more mineral loss, the greater the risk for
osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, hypothyroidism, coronary artery disease,
high blood pressure and a long list of degenerative diseases generally
associated with premature aging.
A growing number of health care practitioners and
scientists from around the world have been advocating the theory that
aging and disease is the direct result of the accumulation of acid waste
products in the body.
There is a great deal of scientific documentation that
supports such a theory. A poor diet may be partially to blame for the
waste accumulation.
These and other junk foods can cause the body to become more acidic:
meats
sugar
alcohol
fried foods
soft drinks
processed foods
white flour products
dairy products
Stress, whether mental or physical can lead to acid deposits in the body.
There is a correlation between the consumption of soft
water (distilled water is extremely soft) and the incidence of
cardiovascular disease. Cells, tissues and organs do not like to be
dipped in acid and will do anything to buffer this acidity including the
removal of minerals from the skeleton and the manufacture of
bicarbonate in the blood.
The longer one drinks distilled water, the more likely the development of mineral deficiencies and an acid state.
I have done well over 3000 mineral evaluations using a
combination of blood, urine and hair tests in my practice. Almost
without exception, people who consume distilled water exclusively,
eventually develop multiple mineral deficiencies.
Those who supplement their distilled water intake with
trace minerals are not as deficient but still not as adequately
nourished in minerals as their non-distilled water drinking counterparts
even after several years of mineral supplementation.
The ideal water for the human body should be slightly alkaline and this requires the presence of minerals like
calcium
magnesium
Distilled water tends to be acidic and can only be
recommended as a way of drawing poisons out of the body. Once this is
accomplished, the continued drinking of distilled water is a bad idea.
Water filtered through reverse osmosis tends to be neutral and is acceptable for regular use provided minerals are supplemented.
Water filtered through a solid charcoal filter is
slightly alkaline. Ozonation of this charcoal filtered water is ideal
for daily drinking. Longevity is associated with the regular consumption
of hard water (high in minerals). Disease and early death is more
likely to be seen with the long term drinking of distilled water.
Avoid it except in special circumstances.
References
Airola, P. 1974. How To Get Well. Phoenix, AZ: Health Plus Publishers. Baroody, Dr. Theodore A. Jr. Alkalinize or Die. California:Portal Books, 1995. Haas,
Elson M. Staying Healthy with Nutrition. The Complete Guide to Diet
& Nutritional Medicine. Berkeley, California:Celestial Arts, 1992;
p. 22. Rona, Zoltan P. and Martin, Jeanne Marie. Return to the Joy of Health, Vancouver: Alive Books, 1995. Rona, Zoltan P. Childhood Illness and The Allergy Connection. Rocklin, California:Prima Books, 1996
The UK government is now paying medical professionals to get vaccinated.
According to MK News, the UK Government has decided there is
more than one way to force hospital staff into receiving this year’s
flu vaccine. Knowing that many hospitals are struggling financially, the
government has decided to turn their hand to bribery by offering extra
cash to financially dependent hospitals, on the proviso that they
vaccinate all their staff with this year’s flu vaccine. MK News, reporting on the story, said:
“Figures have revealed that less than
half of all frontline NHS staff are vaccinated against flu, and at some
hospitals, this can fall as low as one in five.
But in order to give hospitals an
incentive for extra cash, the funds will only be released to them if
they meet a robust target of vaccinating 75 percent of staff against
flu.
And while the figures will not affect
the hospitals’ £1.4m funding this year, if they do not meet the
figures, it will affect the amount they are given next year.”
What this means is that any hospital failing to meet this year’s flu
vaccination target will not only fail to receive this year’s extra
funding, but they will also lose out next year as well. UK’s Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt explained that he wanted every NHS
trust to vaccinate more than 75 percent of their staff this year in
order to protect vulnerable patients. [2]
An Unofficial, Unethical, and Illogical Mandate
However, is force vaccination the way forward? Many irate hospital
staff are extremely angry and have accused the UK government of
emotional blackmail, calling the move unethical. One health care
professional, commenting on the story in Nursing Times, stated:
“This isn’t giving people a choice to
get vaccinated or not. Sounds like they’re holding trusts to ransom,
saying you’ve got to get 75 percent of your staff vaccinated so that the
underfunded A&E departments can receive a little top up (after
years of under-resourcing). Or, it’s a great ploy of not paying anything
at all, as a good guess that there won’t be enough staff getting
vaccinated.
Flu jabs are no guarantee of keeping people out of A&E over winter.
Also, does this mean people who don’t work in the NHS or where there isn’t an A&E won’t have to worry?
I [would] like to see/hear chief
execs, directors, senior managers and politicians all get their jabs
first, then work a couple weeks as frontline staff would between
Christmas and New Year, lead by example and put their money where their
mouth is.” [3]
Quite right, too. They should indeed put their money where their mouth is. While these idiots are force-vaccinating NHS staff around the UK,
using their cash as nice, fat, juicy carrots, I wonder if they are
informing the staff about the possible side effects of the vaccine and
telling them that far from protecting them against the flu, the vaccine
could give them the flu, instead! The CDC says:
“The nasal spray (also called LAIV or
FluMist®): The viruses in the nasal-spray vaccine are weakened and do
not cause severe symptoms often associated with influenza illness. (In
clinical studies, transmission of vaccine viruses to close contacts has
occurred only rarely.)
In children, side effects from LAIV (FluMist®) can include:
runny nose
wheezing
headache
vomiting
muscle aches
fever
In adults, side effects from LAIV (FluMist®) can include:
runny nose
headache
sore throat
cough” [4]
The above list of impressive side effects from the vaccine, given by
the CDC, certainly sounds like the flu to me. So, what is the point of
giving nurses, who spend their time looking after sick and vulnerable
patients, a vaccine that will cause the very symptoms they wish to
avoid?
The Flu Vaccine Can Cause Death
In 2011, the co-founder of the Safe Schools Campaign, Mary
Tocco, wrote that it is common knowledge that the flu vaccination has
the potential to cause serious side effects including death:
“They combine various flu virus
strains based on an educated guess and then recommend the shot to
everyone, including children and pregnant mothers. According to the CDC
Vital Statistics Report 1999-2003, influenza death for children under
the age of 5 skyrocketed as they began to implement the flu vaccine for
the children. From 1999 to early 2002, death rates were declining from
25 down to 10 per year. Then, the latter half of 2002 the CDC mandated
the flu vaccine for children and the death rate climbed from 25 deaths
per year in 1999 to over 90 in 2002! Death is a pretty bad vaccine side
effect!” [5]
Given her evidence, I personally believe that it is far safer to
catch the flu, than it is to risk a virtually untested vaccination
concocted from an educated guess at what this year’s flu strain is going
to be.
Conclusion
Nurses have always been thought of as natural born carers. To force
them to have vaccinations by dangling a nice juicy carrot in front of
them with a vaccine syringe on the end and saying that their patients
will suffer if they do not have the vaccination is pure evil. This is
nothing short of emotional blackmail. Why should the government think that it is right to deny hospitals
much-needed funds all year and then say that the money is only available
if they vaccinate their staff with dangerous and unnecessary vaccines? Let’s face it. If all staff members do decide to have the flu
vaccine, “for the sake of their patients,” and 90 percent of them end up
with the flu as a result, then what exactly is the government going to
do? I can hardly see the UK Prime Minister, David Cameron and Deputy
Prime Minister, Nick Clegg, changing beds and carrying bedpans. Can you?
Antipsychotic drugs are usually considered to be one of the
20th century’s major medical breakthroughs. They are often believed to
be so effective that they brought about the closure of the old mental
asylums and enabled the mentally ill to return to the community.
But newer antipsychotics, such as…
Bipolar isn’t psychotic.
Jacobnmartinez
Antipsychotic drugs are usually considered to be one of
the 20th century’s major medical breakthroughs. They are often believed
to be so effective that they brought about the closure of the old mental
asylums and enabled the mentally ill to return to the community. But newer antipsychotics, such as Zyprexa and Seroquel, are no longer
just used to treat severe mental disturbance but have broken into the
mainstream to become some of the most profitable drugs in history. They now rival statins (used to lower cholesterol) and
antidepressants in terms of the revenue they bring in. And in England,
their use has increased by two thirds over the last few years. The most lucrative market is for treating the newly fashionable diagnosis of bipolar disorder. But far from normalising these drugs, we should be worried about
their increasing use. While antipsychotics can be useful for those who
are severely psychotic, these dangerous drugs should be considered with a
heavy dose of caution.
Bizarre practices
The first drug considered to be an antipsychotic was chlorpromazine,
also known as Largactil or Thorazine, which was introduced into
psychiatry in the early 1950s. Even from these early days, almost nothing about the story of antipsychotics is as told. Henri Laborit in 1991 Erling MandelmannHenri Laborit, the French surgeon proclaimed as a hero for
introducing it to psychiatrist colleagues, was using it in a highly
dangerous procedure he devised called “artificial hibernation” or
“sedation without narcosis”. But the procedure killed off most of the
dogs it was demonstrated on during Laborit’s tour of the US. Psychiatrists who used chlorpromazine and other antipsychotics in the
early days regarded them as special sorts of sedatives and documented
the reduced responsiveness and reactions which were part of the
artificial state they produced. They suggested the drugs worked by
inducing an inhibition of the nervous system and that they reduced
psychotic preoccupations by slowing thought processes and flattening
emotions. People (both with mental illness and volunteers) who’ve taken
antipsychotics also report a state of physical, mental and emotional
suppression. Those suffering from mental disorders describe how the
drugs can help to diminish disturbing thoughts and experiences, but at
the cost of stifling important aspects of their personality such as
initiative, motivation, creativity and sexual drive. As Richard Bentall, an expert on psychosis and a volunteer into a study of Droperidol, described it:
For the first hour I didn’t feel too bad. I thought maybe
this is okay. I can get away with this. I felt a bit light-headed …
[After being asked to fill in a form] I couldn’t have filled it in to
save my life. It would have been easier to climb Mt Everest … It was
accompanied by a feeling that I couldn’t do anything, which is really
distressing. I felt profoundly depressed. They tried to persuade me to
do these cognitive tests on the computer and I just started crying.
Antipsychotics gained a reputation as “chemical straight-jackets” and
they are still used for the control of disturbed and aggressive
behaviour in mental health units – and as animal tranquilisers in
veterinary medicine. Antipsychotics: the chemical version of a straight-jacket? Mark NL
Side effects
There’s been much debate more recently about the value of
antipsychotic treatment but there’s reasonable evidence that they can
reduce the symptoms of an acute psychotic episode in the short-term.
It’s more difficult to judge their longer term benefits. On the one hand, the drugs may suppress mental processes in people
locked into a persistent psychotic state just enough to enable them to
regain a foothold in reality. But for some, the benefits may not
outweigh the considerable mental and physical impairments the drugs can
produce: neurological damage, diabetes, heart disease, impotence and
brain shrinkage. Serious effects have been obscured
because the frank descriptions provided by early clinicians were
replaced by a vision of the drugs as a cleverly targeted, sophisticated
and essentially benign treatment. And despite no convincing evidence to
support the theory, the view emerged that they work by reversing an
underlying “chemical imbalance” or other such abnormality rather than by
inducing an abnormal or altered state. This idea has enormous appeal
for psychiatrists, politicians, consumers and the pharmaceutical
industry. The belief that they reverse a chemical imbalance has been
particularly useful in distracting attention from the serious harm they
can do. It has also enabled antipsychotics to be marketed to a wider segment
of the population and fostered a movement that antipsychotics should be
started as early as possible, without waiting for a definite diagnosis.
Even more worrying, there has been a trend to prescribe them as a
preventative measure in young people who are not psychotic but might be
“at risk”.
The bipolar market
The popularity of antipsychotics has occurred partly through the
transformation of the concept of bipolar disorder over recent years.
Once considered rare, episodic and seriously disabling, bipolar disorder
has expanded – under pharmaceutical industry influence – into the vague
notion of “mood swings” that can apply to almost anyone. Although drugs such as antipsychotics have only been properly tested
in people with classical bipolar (previously known as manic depression)
and have never been shown to be useful for everyday variations in mood,
people who might previously have been characterised as “depressed” may
now be encouraged to view themselves as bipolar. In this way
antipsychotics can corner some of the vast antidepressant drug market. The way antipsychotics have been misrepresented, their benefits
inflated, their dangers minimised, illustrates how what is presented as
neutral and objective “science” may in fact conceal a whole array of
political and commercial interests. The psychiatric profession wanted to
present a new image to society and politicians wished to replace costly
mental institutions with cheaper community care. All of this has helped transform antipsychotic drugs from dreaded
chemical straight-jackets to modern-day soothers, lining the coffers of
the pharmaceutical industry along the way. It’s time we woke up.
Health Impact News Editor Comments: I spoke with Joseph Jauregui
about the joy he and his brothers and sisters have after seeing their
father change when he started to use coconut oil in his diet. Joe
reported to me that while his father still has a ways to go to be like
his former self before dementia set in, that now his mother and siblings
feel like they have their father back again. Here is his story, which
is a chronology of observations over several weeks. by Joseph Jauregui
My Dad was diagnosed with
Severe Dementia about 7-8 years ago. I still remember the day when he
forgot my name. Ever since then I’ve been praying for him to return to
whom he was, but as time passed he got worse and worse. I saw a very
articulate man go from creative, comical and caring to distraught, lost
and childlike.
He than started having accidents to my
mothers disgust (that was 8 years ago). He was having about 5-6
accidents a day and getting up at all hours of the night. He was going
back in time daily, and even losing the ability to communicate and read.
A friend of mine told me about this
coconut oil and its results and I practically got tears in my eyes (and
I’m a dude haha). So I bought some coconut oil and gave it to my mother
as she cooks all his meals.
I visit every other Saturday, so before I
went I psyched myself up to accept that there would be “no difference”
as my dad is in his 80′s, and I felt he was too far gone. He had been
diagnosed with severe dementia 10 years earlier. Well to my surprise my
mother said he had changed quite a bit, and that he wasn’t getting up as
often at night. And the best part was that she wasn’t complaining about
his antics nearly as much as the past years.
Two weeks later I returned and my father
was far more social, and he even began to tell jokes. He still wasn’t
himself, but a glimse of his former self was there.
I missed going one week but the report
from my sister was good. She called my mom on the phone and my dad
answered. She was surprised that he spoke to her in a way he hadn’t
spoken to her in YEARS. I’m very hopeful, and I gotta say Coconut Oil is
now a part of my routine. It is great in eggs and steamed veggies
(yum!).
I visited the folks this past week and was hoping for more changes, and yes there were.
First off I need to tell you all that my
sister, her husband and child moved in with my folks due to the job
situation. My mother doesn’t like it as the house is small, and she
still gets embarrassed about my dad’s situation, but my dad who has
always been an extrovert loves having more people at home. He was
telling jokes and laughing, giggling…oh what a mess haha! My mother was
telling me that he’s been like that for a couple of days, which is
great, as he really never laughed all that much after the disease hit
him.
I left there feeling very
appreciative of the changes in his life. Those prayers are being
answered, and I’m feeling great. The next day my brother went down to
my folks house and told me that dad did something he hasn’t done in
years – he combed his hair! He is doing things he had not done before.
The coconut oil is working and is having great results in him.
One day I believe he will return to the
person whom he was. The change in him over the 7 weeks has been
far better than I would of hoped for. This diet of coconut oil in
everything he eats has done wonders for him. And my mother didn’t even
complain to me once this week - WAHOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
Merck vaccine developer admits vaccines routinely contain hidden cancer viruses derived from diseased monkeys
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
(NaturalNews) If you haven't yet realized the truth about how vaccines
contain hidden cancer viruses, prepare yourself to be shocked by the
admission you're about to hear. Decades ago, one of the most prominent
vaccine scientists in the history of the vaccine industry -- a Merck
scientist -- made a recording where he openly admitted that vaccines
given to Americans were contaminated with leukemia and cancer viruses.
In hearing this admission, his colleagues (who are also recorded here) break into laughter
and seem to think it's hilarious. They then suggest that because these
vaccines are first tested in Russia, their side effects will help the
U.S. win the Olympics because the Russian athletes will all be "loaded
down with tumors."
For the record, this is the same vaccine that
was given to tens of millions of Americans and promoted by the
government. To this day, people still carry these hidden cancer viruses
which have proven to be a boon to the cancer industry.
The
presence of SV40 cancer viruses in vaccines isn't some conspiracy
theory, by the way: these are the words of a top Merck scientist who
probably had no idea that his recording would be widely heard across the
internet one day. He probably thought this conversation would remain a
secret forever. When asked why this didn't get out to the press, he
replied "Obviously you don't go out, this is a scientific affair within
the scientific community."
In other words, vaccine scientists
cover for vaccine scientists. They keep all their dirty secrets within
their own circle of silence and don't reveal the truth about the
contamination of their vaccines.
Transcript of audio interview with Dr. Maurice Hilleman
Dr. Horowitz: Listen now to the voice of the worlds leading vaccine expert Dr Maurice Hilleman, Chief of the Merck Pharmaceutical Company's vaccine
division relay this problem he was having with imported monkeys. He
best explains the origin of AIDS, but what you are about to hear was cut
from any public disclosures.
Dr Maurice Hilleman: and I think that vaccines have to be considered the bargain basement technology for the 20th century.
Narrator:
50 years ago when Maurice Hilleman was a high school student in Miles
City Montana, he hoped he might qualify as a management trainee for the
local JC Penney's store. Instead he went on to pioneer more
breakthroughs in vaccine research and development than anyone in the
history of American medicine. Among the discoveries he made at Merck,
are vaccines for mumps, rubella and measles…
Dr Edward Shorter: Tell me how you found SV40 and the polio vaccine.
Dr Maurice Hilleman: Well, that was at Merck. Yeah, I came to Merck. And uh, I was going to develop vaccines. And we had wild viruses
in those days. You remember the wild monkey kidney viruses and so
forth? And I finally after 6 months gave up and said that you cannot
develop vaccines with these damn monkeys, we're finished and if I can't
do something I'm going to quit, I'm not going to try it. So I went down
to see Bill Mann at the zoo in Washington DC and I told Bill Mann, I
said "look, I got a problem and I don't know what the hell to do." Bill
Mann is a real bright guy. I said that these lousy monkeys are picking
it up while being stored in the airports in transit, loading, off
loading. He said, very simply, you go ahead and get your monkeys out of
West Africa and get the African Green, bring them into Madrid unload
them there, there is no other traffic there for animals, fly them into
Philadelphia and pick them up. Or fly them into New York and pick them
up, right off the airplane. So we brought African Greens in and I didn't
know we were importing the AIDS virus at the time.
Miscellaneous background voices:…(laughter)…
it was you who introduced the AIDS virus into the country. Now we know!
(laughter) This is the real story! (laughter) What Merck won't do to
develop a vaccine! (laughter)
Dr Maurice Hilleman: So
what he did, he brought in, I mean we brought in those monkeys, I only
had those and this was the solution because those monkeys didn't have
the wild viruses but we…
Dr Edward Shorter: Wait, why didn't the greens have the wild viruses since they came from Africa?
Dr Maurice Hilleman:
…because they weren't, they weren't, they weren't being infected in
these group holding things with all the other 40 different viruses…
Dr Edward Shorter: but they had the ones that they brought from the jungle though...
Dr Maurice Hilleman:
…yeah, they had those, but those were relatively few what you do you
have a gang housing you're going to have an epidemic transmission of
infection in a confined space. So anyway, the greens came in and now we
have these and were taking our stocks to clean them up and god now I'm
discovering new viruses. So, I said Judas Priest. Well I got an
invitation from the Sister Kinney Foundation which was the opposing
foundation when it was the live virus…
Dr Edward Shorter: Ah, right…
Dr Maurice Hilleman:
Yeah, they had jumped on the Sabin's band wagon and they had asked me
to come down and give a talk at the Sister Kinney Foundation meeting and
I saw it was an international meeting and god, what am I going to talk
about? I know what I'm going to do, I'm going to talk about the
detection of non detectable viruses as a topic.
Dr Albert Sabin
…there were those who didn't want a live virus vaccine…
(unintelligible) …concentrated all its efforts on getting more and more
people to use the killed virus vaccine, while they were supporting me
for research on the live viruses.
Dr Maurice Hilleman: So
now I got to have something (laughter), you know that going to attract
attention. And gee, I thought that damn SV40, I mean that damn
vaculating agent that we have, I'm just going to pick that particular
one, that virus has got to be in vaccines, it's got to be in the Sabin's
vaccines so I quick tested it (laughter) and sure enough it was in
there.
Dr Edward Shorter: I'll be damned
Dr Maurice Hilleman: … And so now…
Dr Edward Shorter: …so you just took stocks of Sabin's vaccines off the shelf here at Merck…
Dr Maurice Hilleman: …yeah, well it had been made, it was made at Merck…
Dr Edward Shorter: You were making it for Sabin at this point?
Dr Maurice Hilleman: …Yeah, it was made before I came…
Dr Edward Shorter: yeah, but at this point Sabin is still just doing massive field trials…
Dr Maurice Hilleman: …uh huh
Dr Edward Shorter: okay,
Dr Maurice Hilleman:
…in Russia and so forth. So I go down and I talked about the detection
of non detectable viruses and told Albert, I said listen Albert you know
you and I are good friends but I'm going to go down there and you're
going to get upset. I'm going to talk about the virus that it's in your
vaccine. You're going to get rid of the virus, don't worry about it,
you're going to get rid of it… but umm, so of course Albert was very
upset...
Dr Edward Shorter: What did he say?
Dr Maurice Hilleman:
…well he said basically, that this is just another obfuscation that's
going to upset vaccines. I said well you know, you're absolutely right,
but we have a new era here we have a new era of the detection and the
important thing is to get rid of these viruses.
Dr Edward Shorter: Why would he call it an obfuscation if it was a virus that was contaminating the vaccine?
Dr Maurice Hilleman: …well there are 40 different viruses in these vaccines anyway that we were inactivating and uh,
Dr Edward Shorter: but you weren't inactivating his though…
Dr Maurice Hilleman:
…no that's right, but yellow fever vaccine had leukemia virus in it and
you know this was in the days of very crude science. So anyway I went
down and talked to him and said well, why are you concerned about it?
Well I said "I'll tell you what, I have a feeling in my bones that this
virus is different, I don't know why to tell you this but I
…(unintelligible) …I just think this virus will have some long term
effects." And he said what? And I said "cancer". (laughter) I said
Albert, you probably think I'm nuts, but I just have that feeling. Well
in the mean time we had taken this virus and put it into monkeys and
into hamsters. So we had this meeting and that was sort of the topic of
the day and the jokes that were going around was that "gee, we would win
the Olympics because the Russians would all be loaded down with
tumors." (laughter) This was where the vaccine was being tested, this
was where… so, uhh, and it really destroyed the meeting and it was sort
of the topic. Well anyway…
Dr Edward Shorter: Was this the physicians… (unintelligible) …meeting in New York?
Dr Maurice Hilleman …well no, this was at Sister Kinney…
Dr Edward Shorter: Sister Kinney, right…
Dr Maurice Hilleman: …and Del Becco (sp) got up and he foresaw problems with these kinds of agents.
Dr Edward Shorter: Why didn't this get out into the press?
Dr Maurice Hilleman:
…well, I guess it did I don't remember. We had no press release on it.
Obviously you don't go out, this is a scientific affair within the
scientific community…
Voice of news reporter: …an historic
victory over a dread disease is dramatically unfolded at the U of
Michigan. Here scientists usher in a new medical age with the monumental
reports that prove that the Salk vaccine against crippling polio to be a
sensational success. It's a day of triumph for 40 year old Dr. Jonas E
Salk developer of the vaccine. He arrives here with Basil O'Connor the
head of the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis that financed
the tests. Hundreds of reporters and scientists gathered from all over
the nation gathered for the momentous announcement….
Dr Albert Sabin:
…it was too much of a show, it was too much Hollywood. There was too
much exaggeration and the impression in 1957 that was, no in 1954 that
was given was that the problem had been solved , polio had been
conquered.
Dr Maurice Hilleman: …but, anyway we knew it
was in our seed stock from making vaccines. That virus you see, is one
in 10,000 particles is not an activated… (unintelligible) …it was good
science at the time because that was what you did. You didn't worry
about these wild viruses.
Dr Edward Shorter: So you discovered, it wasn't being inactivated in the Salk vaccine?
Dr Maurice Hilleman:
…Right. So then the next thing you know is, 3, 4 weeks after that we
found that there were tumors popping up on these hamsters.
Dr. Horowitz: Despite AIDS and Leukemia suddenly becoming pandemic from "wild viruses" Hilleman said, this was "good science" at that time.
Get it yet? Vaccines are the SOURCE of our modern-day epidemics of chronic disease
There
is a dark, deadly truth about the vaccine industry, the CDC and vaccine
scientists everywhere. The truth is that vaccines are the vector by
which cancer and other diseases are spread through the human population.
The
rise of many diseases -- such as cancer -- correlates very strongly
with the rise of mandatory vaccinations around the world.
Get this book
and be blown away by what you find inside. The data presented in the
multitude of charts destroy the false narrative of modern-day vaccine
pushers.
Also check out the related website, which includes many of the charts and graphs from the book: www.dissolvingillusions.com
![ninetymilesbjtcQw1rjmkoko1_500[1]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_vV9Z4mTVf9YpJAkALClv3taO0lYszklh92qwykqfwLHs3KsPVkh4U8-Qa32XqQG7OxbMGYBlBGeM1u22ShRsz9rNYKudGPzVbeftlAz8QcYgY6vPiwlZg54JVjnV0xIHUI4T4vxkIHSXZLqxDnzyCKNN88BrARF-f5yJzOee1nZkPrEc9yin08SQ=s0-d)
By: Roger Landry (TLB)![gardasil-cartoon[1]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_thExhuU4nL564Bd5waR-PhwACVo43R-X2iUxosL1p_Gg2eq5VpKxciS2cbVbDOzvU_ePF1EM5KDvl_cHzhDfmuHDmDVQnIzjdtSH6Y3K5hMr4re6A1Rn8SqB_sPtmk0cnOSzFNn6P4P3bZnDoeozaJA7mOv4bo7shy-9E=s0-d)
Is
it just coincidence that the rise in these diseases coincides almost
perfectly with the massive drive to vaccinate the American public and
put a huge portion of this population on psychotropic drugs? Is it just a
coincidence that we are the most vaccinated and drugged nation on this
planet? When does coincidence become fact?
![ninetymilesbjtcQw1rjmkoko1_500[1]](http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/ninetymilesbjtcQw1rjmkoko1_5001.jpg)
By: Roger Landry (TLB)![gardasil-cartoon[1]](http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/gardasil-cartoon1.jpg)
Is
it just coincidence that the rise in these diseases coincides almost
perfectly with the massive drive to vaccinate the American public and
put a huge portion of this population on psychotropic drugs? Is it just a
coincidence that we are the most vaccinated and drugged nation on this
planet? When does coincidence become fact?
Twist and Sprout
